In vitro evaluation of halogen light-activated vs chemically activated in-office bleaching systems.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the tooth whitening efficacy, temperature and HP concentration changes induced by halogen light-activated and chemically activated in-office bleaching systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four extracted premolars were randomly divided into two groups (n = 12): Group BL (35% HP with halogen light activation) and Group OP (38% HP with chemical activation). Tooth color was measured by a spectrophotometer according to the CIE L*a*b* color space system. Temperatures of bleaching gels and pulp chambers during the bleaching process were monitored and recorded by a digital multimeter with K-type thermocouple. HP concentrations were tested before and after treatments by iodometry. ANOVA and paired t-test were used for statistical analyses at the significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Tooth whitening resulted in the increase of DeltaL* and DeltaE and reduction of Deltab*. Paired t-tests revealed groups BL had greater DeltaE than group OP, however, there was no statistically significant difference in DeltaE between them after 3 weeks post-treatment. Maximal temperature rise (DeltaT) was found only in group BL, showing the increment of 2.55 and 2.02 degrees C for bleaching gels and pulp chambers, respectively. HP concentrations were higher than baseline values for group OP (p < 0.001) rather than group BL. CONCLUSIONS: Halogen light and chemically activated in-office bleaching systems were both effective for tooth whitening, but halogen light activation could improve the immediate whitening effect. In contrast, chemical activation was a more conservative method due to the little temperature rise in pulp chambers.