Tracheal intubation in patients with odentogenous abscesses and reduced mouth opening.

BACKGROUND: Odentogenous abscesses with involvement of the facial or cervical spaces can be life-threatening and often have to be drained under general anaesthesia. Trismus and swelling can make intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope difficult or even impossible. However, indirect laryngoscopy has been successful when conventional direct laryngoscopy has failed. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of the Glidescope laryngoscope in patients with odentogenous abscesses and the improvement in mouth opening after neuromuscular block. METHODS: After approval of the ethics committee, 100 patients with odentogenous abscesses were randomized to undergo tracheal intubation with the Glidescope or Macintosh laryngoscope. Success rate, visualization of the glottis, intubation duration, and need for supporting manoeuvres were evaluated. RESULTS: Intubation with the Glidescope was always successful, while conventional intubation failed in 17 out of 50 patients (P<0.0001). In all patients in whom conventional tracheal intubation failed, a subsequent attempt with the Glidescope was successful. The view at the glottis (according to Cormack and Lehane; P<0.0001), intubation duration [34 s (CI 27-41) vs 67 s (CI 52-82), mean (95% confidence interval); P=0.0001], and need for supporting manoeuvres (P<0.0001) were significantly different. The inter-incisor distance improved overall with induction of anaesthesia from 2.0 cm (CI 1.8-2.2) to 2.6 cm (CI 2.3-2.9; P<0.0001) and was correlated with the duration of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with odentogenous abscesses, the use of a Glidescope laryngoscope was associated with significantly faster tracheal intubation, with a better view, fewer supporting manoeuvres, and a higher success rate than with a conventional laryngoscope. Improvement of the inter-incisor distance after induction of anaesthesia correlated with the duration of symptoms.