STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Conventionally, the fabrication method for Co-Cr restorations has been casting by the lost-wax method. Milling and selective laser melting (SLM) are more cost effective and thereby increasingly used. The precision of the different methods regarding internal and marginal fit, however, is not fully known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine and evaluate whether the 3 fabrication methods of conventional casting, milling, and SLM differ in internal and marginal fit for Co-Cr fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Co-Cr metal frameworks for 3-unit FDPs were made with 3 fabrication methods for a model with 2 abutment preparations. Internal fit was measured with the replica method. A white silicone indicator material simulated the cement space. This was measured by light microscopy at x20 magnification and a digital measurement program. Marginal fit was evaluated with the direct-sight technique at x4.6 magnification and given a score from 1 to 5. One-way ANOVA and Tukey honest significance tests were used to evaluate differences among groups with regard to internal fit. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to calculate differences among groups with regard to marginal gap. The Pearson r test was used for correlations calculations (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in both internal and marginal fit among the test groups (P<.003). The milled group had the best overall fit, followed by the cast and SLM groups. CONCLUSIONS: SLM restorations had the poorest internal and marginal fit, whereas the milling method had the best results. The SLM technique did not achieve clinically acceptable values for internal fit.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.