The aim of the present study was to compare prebent and manually-bent plates used in maxillary advancement. The prebent plates were fixed in polyurethane blocks for the linear test and aluminium blocks for the cyclic test, and the manually-bent plates were fixed in polyurethane and aluminium blocks. The linear load tests were done using an Instron((R)) 4411 mechanical testing machine and the cyclic test with an Instron((R)) E3000 testing machine. The linear mechanical test showed that there was no significant difference between the plates. In the cyclic test the prebent plates reached the limit of 500000 cycles without fracturing whereas the manually-bent plate group fractured before reaching the limit of cycles (p=0.008). The decision to use prebent or manually-bent plates during operations should be influenced by the production of the bends and their consequent brittleness.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.