PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit and mechanical stability of conventional versus passive fitting 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) screw-retained on implants. METHODS: Twenty acrylic models, each with two embedded implants, were fabricated and functioned as patient-models. Impressions were taken and 20 all-ceramic FDPs were pre-fabricated on the plaster casts. Respectively 10 FDPs were fixed on the plaster casts (group 1) and on the patient-models for passive fitting (group 2). The fit of each FDP was checked on the patient-model by means of visual control (grades 1-10) and microscopic examination. Furthermore, specimens were artificially aged for possible prosthodontic failures, followed by a fracture strength test. RESULTS: Group 2 [1.4 (+/-0.3)] showed significantly (p<0.001) better results in the visual examination of the marginal fit compared to group 1 [6.3 (+/-2.4)]. The microscopic marginal misfit was 160mum (+/-80mum) at the abutment margin and 150mum (+/-80mum) at the axial wall of the abutment for group 1, respectively, 0mum and 0mum up to 17mum for group 2 (p<0.001). No failure of the FDPs could be observed during artificial aging in both groups. The fracture load showed no significant difference (p=0.60) between group 1 [2583N (+/-664N)] and group 2 [2465N (+/-238N)]. CONCLUSIONS: Visual and microscopic examination detected huge differences in marginal fit between groups 1 and 2. However, no statistically verifiable differences could be detected in long-term stability of implant-supported FDPs irrespective of the fit.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.