Although it is believed that implementation of the functional generated path (FGP) technique can facilitate occlusal surface design for restorations, it has not been objectively compared in situ with the conventional fabrication yet. Therefore, in the present study, a single-blind crossover clinical trial was conducted using T-scan to compare changes in occlusion time (OT) and disocclusion time (DT) of single posterior artificial crowns designed differently using FGP technique (FGP), average-value FGP technique (AVR) and conventional fabrication (CON). Each of the 10 participants took part in the study tried three artificial crowns in different sequences according to a computer generated randomization list. The results objectively revealed that changes in OT and DT were significantly smaller for FGP than CON (P < 0.05) and considerably smaller for AVR than CON, respectively. The subjective feedback and the occlusal adjusting time were better and shorter for FGP and AVR than CON (P < 0.05). No harm to the participants occurred. Overall, FGP is an efficient technique showing more physiological harmonious relationship with the articulating system.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.