Masking Colored Substrates Using Monolithic and Bilayer CAD-CAM Ceramic Structures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the masking ability and translucency of monolithic and bilayer CAD-CAM ceramic structures. METHODS: Discs of high translucency (HT) and low translucency (LT) lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) with different thicknesses (0.7, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm) were evaluated as a monolithic structure or combined (bilayer) with a 0.5-mm-thick zirconia framework (IPS e.max ZirCAD). The masking ability and translucency were calculated based on CIE L*a*b* color coordinates measured with a spectrophotometer (SP60, X-Rite). The translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using color coordinates measured over standard white-and-black backgrounds. The masking ability was calculated by CIEDE2000 color difference metric (DeltaE(00)) for each specimen measured over a tooth-colored substrate (shade A2) compared to three darker backgrounds (shade C4 and two metal substrates). Confidence intervals (CI) for the means (95% CI) were calculated for TP and DeltaE(00). The Pearson correlation between DeltaE(00) and TP was investigated for monolithic and bilayer structures over all backgrounds. RESULTS: The thinner the lithium disilicate layer, the greater the translucency and the higher the DeltaE(00) values. The effect of ceramic thickness on both translucency and masking ability was more pronounced for the monolithic structures. In addition, monolayers always presented a greater color variation than their bilayer counterparts. The metallic background produced greater DeltaE(00) than the C4-shaded substrate. CONCLUSION: Monolithic veneers were able to mask C4-shaded background but did not mask metallic backgrounds. Bilayer structures showed greater shade masking ability than monolithic structures.