OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) with the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49) questionnaire as screening tools to detect psychological comorbidity in TMDs. METHODS: A TMD group (92 patients, 42.8 +/- 17.1 yrs) and a control group (90 patients of the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, 38.9 +/- 10.1 yrs) completed the WHO-5 and the OHIP-49 questionnaire. RESULTS: The patients with TMD reported significantly greater OHIP-49 sum scores than controls (47.5 +/- 34.7 vs. 7.7 +/- 12.1; p < 0.001). The mean raw score of the WHO-5 was significantly less, with 45.6 +/- 20.6 points for patients with TMD than the 73.2 +/- 15.6 points found for controls (p < 0.001). The OHIP sum score and the WHO-5 raw score were significantly associated (r = 0.705, p < 0.001). Both instruments exhibited excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.967 and 0.883, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: WHO-5 proved to be an effective and economic screening instrument to detect psychological comorbidity in TMDs. Implementing WHO-5 in standard care could contribute to more individualized interdisciplinary psychotherapy and/or functional therapy.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.