OBJECTIVE: The clinical importance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by definitive surgery was retrospectively investigated in clinical Stage III/IV oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Surgery was performed for OSCC in 164 patients, including 72 patients who had received NAC (two cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil) prior to surgery from January 2004 to December 2014. The clinical characteristics and survival parameters of the groups that received and did not receive NAC were evaluated. The pathological response was classified as Grade 0 (no effect), 1a (very slight effect), 1b (slight effect), 2 (moderate effect) or 3 (marked effect), and its correlation with prognosis was investigated. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in survival indicators between patients who received NAC and those who did not (overall survival, P = 0.75). The proportion of patients who received NAC in the effective NAC group (Grades 1b, 2, and 3) was 52.8%. After a median follow-up of 35 months, overall survival (P = 0.01), disease-free survival (P = 0.002), locoregional disease-free survival (P = 0.003), and distant disease-free survival (P = 0.01) were significantly better in the effective NAC group than in the less effective NAC group (Grades 0 and 1a). CONCLUSION: Although NAC had a limited effect on disease prognosis in OSCC, the pathological response to NAC could be an important prognostic indicator for advanced OSCC.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.