Evaluation of accuracy and sensory outcomes of mandibular reconstruction using computer-assisted surgical simulation.

PURPOSE: To introduce a modified protocol for mandibular reconstruction and evaluate the protocol using a standardized assessment method. METHOD: This retrospective study involved a case series of nine patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction between 2015 and 2017. The modular protocol comprised three novel modifications in terms of computer-assisted surgical simulation (CASS); surgical template (ST), and surgical procedure. The standardized postoperative evaluation consisted of operation time, part comparison analysis (PCA), facial symmetry, and mechanical quantitative sensory testing. RESULTS: The surgery successfully removed the affected mandible and preserved the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle (IANB). PCA revealed that the mean error and standard deviation were 0.92 and 0.96 mm, respectively, for all mandibular surface sites. Follow-up results showed good facial symmetry, existence of sensation in lower lip, and no significant differences in pulp vitality between both sides (p = 0.181). Also, the results showed a reduction in the overall operating time. CONCLUSION: The modified mandibular reconstruction method used in this study could repair lateral mandibular defects and preserve the sensory function of the chin and lower lip.