OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze referral patterns to a university-based oral medicine (OM) clinic and to identify access issues to OM care. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective patient chart review on all OM specialists at the University of Alberta (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) over a 1-year period was performed. Data collected included patient age and gender, referring clinician training and experience, reason and urgency of referral, provisional and final diagnosis, and the referral times. Proportions for data points were collected by using a 95% Wilson Score confidence interval. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests were performed for significant differences. RESULTS: In total, 924 patients were included. Dentists referred 81.4% of the cases, with the remaining cases referred by physicians. Patients traveled, on average, 55.44 km to the OM clinic, with a mean wait time of 105.5 days. White/red lesions were the most common referral reason (38%), with the tongue (21.8%) being the most common site of concern. There was no significant difference in the accuracy of provisional diagnoses between clinician types. Immune-mediated conditions were the most common final diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The referral patterns of dental and medical practitioners are similar, with mucosal lesions being the most common referral reason. In our study population, access to care was compromised by wait times and travel distances.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.