OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the stress and displacement pattern between conventional and micro-implant supported retraction in lingual orthodontic system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element model of the maxilla, teeth, periodontal ligament, lingual-orthodontic appliance and a micro-implant complex was constructed using ANSYS 12.1 software. Two sizes of micro-implants, 6mm and 8mm, were constructed producing a simulated model of 99,190 nodes and 32,4364 elements. A retraction force of 200g was applied from an anterior retraction hook to the molar tube in the conventional model and from the micro-implants in the implant supported model. The initial displacement and stress patterns in the X-Y-Z axes were obtained using Hyper-view software. RESULTS: The maximum von Mises stresses in the 6mm, 8mm and conventional model were 22.164 Megapascals (MPa), 28.603MPa and 16.491MPa respectively. The bucco-lingual displacement of the maxillary anteriors was greater in the 8mm implant model with 23x10(-3)mm lingual displacement observed. The least lingual displacement of 11x10(-3)mm was noted for the conventional model while a slightly higher moderate reading of 15x10(-3)mm was seen in the 6mm micro-implant supported model. The maximum displacement of the periodontal ligament was noted in the 8mm micro-implant model. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this research, the 8mm micro-implant model displayed high initial stresses and greater initial displacement of the anterior teeth in the X-Y-Z coordinates in comparison to conventional retraction method.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.