Orthognathic surgery, now well known to the general public, is becoming increasingly successful. It is the most predictable approach to the treatment of dento-maxillo-facial deformities. As with plastic surgery the number of indications increasing the number of difficult cases follows as well as the searching for perfection. The aim of these treatments must be triple and take into account the functional elements of the face, the dental occlusion and the aesthetic objectives of the patient and therapists. Orthognathic surgery procedures having become quite bearable patients who feel that the result is not up to their requirement easily require a reoperation to achieve their objective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 10 cases of facial redone osteotomies from 4 different surgeons. We looked at the initial indication, the type of surgery, the initial orofacial functions, the delay of the reoperation, the technique of redo and the result. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Like other authors, we found that there are surgeries and at-risk patients. The patients who were re-operated all had at least one of the three negative factors: OSAS, lingual dysfunction, oral ventilation. We have not been able to highlight an overall frequency of surgical resumption in the studied literature which is poor about reoperations after osteotomies of the face.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.