Objective: To present comparative data with the aim of assisting the practitioner to choose between behavior modification (BM) techniques, pharmacologic sedation (N(2)O-O(2) alone or combined with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg) or routine general anesthesia (GA) for the most successful approach in enabling pediatric dental care. Study design: Dental records of 56 children treated in a university dental clinic between 2006-2016 were reviewed, and data on age, gender, required treatment (amalgam restorations, composite restorations, pulpotomy, and stainless steel crowns [SSC]), treatment approaches and therapeutic success at final follow-up were retrieved. Results: Treatment under GA had the best success rates compared to both BM and pharmacologic sedation. N(2)O-O(2) alone had a 6.1-fold greater risk of failure compared to N(2)O-O(2)+midazolam (p- <0.008). Amalgam restorations had a 2.61-fold greater risk of failure than SSC (p- <0.008). Conclusions: The GA mode yielded significantly greater success than the N(2)O-O(2) mode alone. There were no significant differences in success rates between GA and combined midazolam 0.5 mg/kg+N(2)O-O(2). When choosing restoration material, it is important to remember the high success rate of SSC compared to amalgam restoration.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.