Low-quality Evidence Suggests Digital Impressions (DIs) and Conventional Impressions Are Comparable for Marginal and Internal Fit, Very-low Quality Evidence for Interproximal and Occlusal Contacts is Insufficient to Draw Conclusion and There Is No Evidence Regarding Survival of Full-coverage Restorations.
ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Digital versus conventional impressions for full-coverage restorations. Nagarkar SR, Perdigao J, Seong W-J, THeis-Mahon N. JADA 2018;149(2):139-47. SOURCE OF FUNDING: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of data.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.