INTRODUCTION: Pell & Gregory and Winter classifications are basic in third molar categorization; Sanchez-Torres classification is used in Mexico, but it has not been previously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of agreement in the radiographic evaluation of impacted mandibular third molar with the use of three classifications: Pell & Gregory, Winter and Sanchez-Torres. METHOD: Observational, descriptive, inter-observer degree of agreement study that included 10 oral and maxillofacial surgeons and 10 training residents, who recorded the radiographic categorization of third mandibular molars (left and right) according to Pell and Gregory, Sanchez-Torres and Winter classifications. Inter-observer degree of agreement was assessed with Fleiss' kappa test. RESULTS: Pell and Gregory classification obtained the lowest degree of agreement (kappa = 0.05 and 0.185), followed by Sanchez-Torres classification (kappa = 0.125 and 0.326); Winter had the best agreement, with kappa = 0.28 and 0.636 for oral and maxillofacial surgeons and training residents, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Winter classification showed an acceptable (moderate) degree of agreement to classify mandibular third molars by training residents.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.