Tapered Versus Inverted Body-Shift Implants Placed Into Anterior Post-extraction Sockets: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective comparative radiographic and clinical studywas performed to evaluate primary stability, bone volume, and esthetic outcomes of tapered (T) implants (control group) versus inverted body-shift (INV) implants (test group). METHODS: A total of 42 platform-switched implants, 21 T and 21 INV, were used to replace nonrestorable teeth in maxillary central incisor post-extraction sockets. Implant primary stability and insertion torque values in addition to radiographic differences in labial plate dimension, tooth-to-implant distance, and marginal bone levels were correlated with clinical outcomes using the pink esthetic score (PES). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P </= .05) were found between groups, with T implants having not only lower primary stability at immediate implant placement than INV implants but also less circumferential bone volume at recall. Consequently, lower PESs were seen in the T implant group that equated to an increased frequency of midfacial recession, tissue discoloration, and papilla loss. CONCLUSIONS: INV implants, which feature a unique macro hybrid design, may offer advantages over T implants in maxillary anterior post-extraction sockets with regard to achieving both higher primary stability and superior esthetic outcomes.