Evaluation and comparison of histologic changes and implant survival in extraction sites immediately grafted with two different xenografts: A randomized clinical pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective, single-center randomized pilot study was to histologically evaluate and compare vital bone development in premolar and molar-extraction sites grafted with two different bovine-derived xenografts. The secondary outcome of interest was implant survival in the grafted sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients in need of at least two tooth extractions were enrolled. A paired design was used; each patient received at least one of each type of graft at different sites. Each extraction site was randomized to one of two xenograft treatment groups. A resorbable membrane was always placed, and primary intention soft tissue closure was achieved. Four months later, implants were placed and a trephine drill was used to remove bone cores for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with 40 extraction sites were enrolled; 20 sites were grafted with one type of xenograft and 20 with another. Mean patient age was 53.5 years, and 65% of patients were male. Evaluation of bone core samples taken from grafted sites showed no significant difference in the mean value of percentage of new bone formation between the different grafted sites (33.4% and 32.4%, p = .76). Cumulative implant survival was 97.5% at the 24-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this pilot study, no statistically significant differences in new bone growth between sites grafted with two different types of xenograft were found. Both graft materials promoted the formation of new bone and provided osseous support for implant placement after socket grafting.