Evaluation of facial aesthetics by laypersons in patients undergoing intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II osteotomy compared with conventional Le Fort I osteotomy.

In this study we compared the aesthetic outcome of (1) Le Fort I (LFI) osteotomy and (2) intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II (IQLFII) osteotomy for surgical correction of skeletal class III dysgnathia involving midfacial deficiency. The aim was to investigate whether laypersons see differences in facial changes that occur due to variations of the osteotomy cuts. The patient collectives consisted of 23 patients in each group. Pre- and postoperative photographs were presented in a random sequence to 40 layperson raters. The rating procedure was conducted with a four-point Likert scale. Assessed characteristics were 'attractiveness' ('Attraktivitat'), 'likeability' ('Sympathie'), 'intelligence' ('Intelligenz'), 'aggressiveness' ('Aggressivitat') and 'dominance' ('Dominanz'). For preoperative photographs we found a significant difference for 'likeability' with lower ratings for the IQLFII group; all other criteria were rated similarly. For the IQLFII group we found a significantly larger shift from lower to higher ratings for 'attractiveness' and 'likeability' and a significantly larger shift from higher to lower ratings for 'aggressiveness' and 'dominance' than for the LF I group. Our study shows that lay raters detect significant differences between the two surgical groups. Thus, IQLFII osteotomy, when indicated, represents a favourable alternative to conventional LFI osteotomy, if patients desire the expectable change in recognition by their social circle.