[Comparison of digital model and dental plaster model in evaluation of bilateral cleft lip and palate].
PURPOSE: To compare the reliability of digital model and plaster model on evaluation of bilateral cleft lip and palate. METHODS: Nineteen pairs of digital and plaster model obtained from bilateral cleft lip and palate patients were measured, including nine measurements, such as maxillary alveolar length, width, cleft width, the deviation of maxillary middle line. One-way ANOVA was conducted for statistical analysis with SPSS 24.0 software package. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the repeated measurements of the two types of models, there was no significant difference in the measurements between two types of models used in clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are suitable for evaluation of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Compared with conventional plaster model, digital model provides a safer and convenient way to obtain useful information both for research and clinical need.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.