BACKGROUND: Whether an individual is over 8 years old is of great significance in clinical medicine and law. The Demirjian, Willems and Cameriere methods are one of the most widely used methods of dental age estimation, but neither method was suitable in Eastern China. And all of them are time-consuming for clinical work. A new and time-saving method for judging whether an individual is 8 years old is yet to be proposed on Eastern Chinese population. AIM: The paper proposes a method for judging whether an individual is 8 years old based on the relationship between age and the first premolar maturity index (I(1PM)), which is related to the measurement of the open apices of the first premolar. SUBJECTS & METHODS: It is a retrospective study where orthopantomograms of 748 children (356 female and 392male) aged 5-13 years were collected and analyzed. Linear regression was used to infer the value of I(1PM) for eastern China. Furthermore, this method was compared to those based on Demirjian's stages F. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A cutoff value of I(1PM) = 0.35 was taken. The sensitivity of this test was 90.0% and specificity was 93.3%. Furthermore, the proportion of individuals with a correct classification was 90.9%. The results of the test showed that Demirjian's stage F performance was lightly better than I(1pm) < 0.35. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of both are greater than or equal to 90.0%, and the differences are not very significant.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.