Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate stress distribution among 4 different customized abutment types: titanium abutment (Ti), titanium hybrid-abutment-crown (Ti-Hybrid), zirconia abutment with titanium base (Zir-TiBase), and zirconia hybrid-abutment-crown with titanium base (Zir-Hybrid-TiBase). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To achieve this purpose, 4 types of abutment configurations were simulated. A static load of 200 N (vertical) and 100 N (oblique) were applied to the models. The volume average, maximum, and stress distribution of von Mises stress, including percentage difference, were analyzed with 3D finite element analysis. RESULTS: According to the volume average von Mises stress, the Ti and Zir-TiBase comparison group showed that the Zir-TiBase group dominantly generated the higher value at Ti-base (22.57 MPa) and screw (17.68 MPa). To evaluate the effect of the hybrid-abutment-crown on volume average von Mises stress by comparing the Ti-Hybrid and Zir-Hybrid-TiBase groups, it was revealed that the combination of abutment and crown in the Ti-Hybrid group generated the worst stress concentration at the screw (12.42 MPa), while in the Zir-Hybrid-TiBase group presented stress concentration at the implant (8.90 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: A titanium base improved stress distribution at implant in zirconia abutment with titanium base by absorbing stress itself. Customized titanium hybrid-abutment-crown and zirconia hybrid-abutment-crown with titanium base created concentrated stress at screw and implant; respectively. Both abutment types should be cautiously used and maintenanced regularly.