OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to summarize and compare the local and systemic impact of different models of experimental periodontitis in mice. DESIGN: After defining the PICO strategy, was performed a search for articles in English following the PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane and LILACS databases. The search strategy provided 8815 articles from which were selected experimental studies comparing the local and/or systemic effects of two or more models for the induction of periodontitis in mice according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: After selection, 7 articles that met the inclusion criteria for the review. Were analyzed differences between the following experimental models of periodontitis in mice: ligature, gavage, injection of bacteria, ligation embedded in bacteria and association between them. CONCLUSION: Although most experimental models of periodontitis are efficient in causing alveolar bone loss, there are differences in their characteristics. In ligature, an acute process is established and the host tends to repair itself, decreasing the significance of this loss over time. In models where bacterial challenge is added bone loss appears to be significant with longer induction time, indicating the presence of a chronic condition. Regarding systemic outcomes, gavage showed greater potential for modulating the host's response with systemic inflammatory changes, proving to be more promising between periodontitis and chronic systemic diseases.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.