2022 The Journal of prosthetic den…

Comparison of the accuracy of impressions made of 2 implants with interfering axial convergence with CAD-CAM impression copings and the altered cast technique: An in vitro study.

, , ,

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 128 (4) : 745.e1-745.e7 • Oct 2022

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies that evaluated the accuracy of different methods for making an impression of 2 implants in close proximity or with adverse axial convergence are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of impressions made with metal and resin computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) impression copings and an altered cast technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two implant analogs with an interimplant angulation of 50 degrees were placed in an acrylic resin master model. Thirty impressions were made with 3 techniques (n=10). Two angled abutments were scanned to print 40 impression copings from a castable resin, half of which were cast with nickel-chromium alloy (M-CAD) and half of these were used in the R-CAD group. Impressions were made and poured. For the altered cast technique (Alt-cast), casts with only the mesial analogs were made and hollowed at the site of the distal analogs. The position of the distal analogs was transferred by resin indices (n=10) fabricated with light-polymerized resin on the master model. The linear displacements of mesial (DeltaR1) and distal (DeltaR2) analogs and the interanalog distance (DeltaRt) were measured with a coordinate measuring machine. The data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the M-CAD and R-CAD groups regarding DeltaR1 (P=.722), DeltaR2 (P=.576), or DeltaRt (P=.939). However, the Alt-cast group differed from the M-CAD group in DeltaR1 (P<.001), DeltaR2 (P<.001), and DeltaRt (P=.002) and also from the R-CAD group in DeltaR1 (P=.001), DeltaR2 (P=.002), and DeltaRt (P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: The impressions made with metal and resin CAD-CAM impression copings were more accurate than those made with the Alt-cast technique although all techniques had acceptable accuracy.

No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper

Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.
PICO Elements

No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.

Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data

No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.

Related Papers

Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.