In-person Versus Virtual Interviews in the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Application Process: An Applicant Perspective.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether in-person vs virtual interviews in the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) residency application process affects an applicant's perspective on a program and his/her comfort level in ranking a program. This study will also look to assess if the continuation of virtual interviews has any socioeconomic impacts on the application pool. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a descriptive survey sent to all applicants in the 2022 to 2023 OMS residency application cycle to The Ohio State University OMS Residency Program (OSU OMS). The survey involved both scaled and comparative questions aimed to deduce applicant's preferences on the mode of interview process. Questions were designed to both target an applicant's ability to differentiate programs as well uncover any socioeconomic impacts that the reinstatement of in-person interviews caused. All obtained statistics were computed for data analysis. RESULTS: There were 187 applicants to the OSU OMS program in the 2022 to 2023 cycle. Fifty-four applicants completed responses (response rate = 28.9%). A total of 84.4% of respondents preferred in-person interviews. CONCLUSIONS: In-person interviews are the preferred modality for OMS interviews. The ability to experience a program and its faculty and residents in-person proved favorable despite the financial and logistical benefits of virtual interviews.