The effect of cone beam computerized tomography voxel size and the presence of root filling on the assessment of middle mesial canals in mandibular molar teeth.

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to compare the detection of the middle mesial canal (MMC) in mandibular molar teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with different voxel sizes when the mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) canals have three distinct phases (unpreparation, preparation and obturation and the removal of the obturation and repreparation). METHODS: Two hundred forty-two extracted human mandibular molars were collected and kept in a physiological saline solution prior to use. 0.2-, 0.28- and 0.35-mm voxel sizes CBCT (n = 242) were performed in three phases (Ph): Ph1, no MB and ML canal preparation or obturation; Ph2, after MB and ML canals preparation and obturation; and Ph3, after the removal of the obturation of MB and ML canals and canals repreparation. Images were analyzed using OnDemand3D(R) software. After the CBCT acquisition in Ph3, all the samples were clarified to visualize the presence of the MMC directly. A blinded, previously calibrated examiner analyzed all the images. RESULTS: The MMC was detected in 15 of the 242 teeth after the clearing technique. The lowest MMC detection rate was observed at 0.35-mm voxel size regardless of the ML and MB canal condition, while the highest was observed at 0.2-mm voxel size (P < 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between 0.2-mm and 0.28-mm voxel sizes (P > 0.05). In all voxel sizes, the highest rate of detectability of the MMC was seen in Phase 1, while the lowest was in Phase 2. CONCLUSIONS: It may be appropriate to take a 0.20-mm voxel size CBCT image, especially after the removal of root canal filling. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An appropriate CBCT voxel size and the absence of root canal filling in the root canal system help to detect the missing MMC.