OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of the phosphoric acid (PA) etching, self-etching technique (SE) and blasting with Al(2)O(3) particles (BL) on the bonding of a dental adhesive to intact (INT) or abraded (ABR) enamel. METHODS: Enamel surfaces were treated as follows: 1- ABR-PA: INT was abraded with SiC paper and etched with PA (20 s) before Clearfil Universal Bond Quick adhesive application; 2- ABR-SE: ABR was SiC and adhesive applied in SE mode; 3- INT-PA: INT was etched with PA and adhesive applied; 4- INT-SE: the adhesive (SE mode) was applied to INT; 5- INT-BL: INT was BL and the adhesive was applied (SE mode), and 6- INT-BA: INT was BL, etched with PA and adhesive applied (SE mode). The enamel surface treated was examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (n = 3) and Al(2)O(3) particles were characterized using SEM and EDX. The enamel bond strength was measured by microtensile test (24 h and 1 year) (n = 8) and the morphology of enamel-adhesive interfaces were analyzed by SEM (n = 3). Bond strength data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Al(2)O(3) particles had an irregular shape, their length varied (50-20 microm) and the perimeter mean was 38.8 microm. The enamel morphology significantly influenced the enamel bond strength. ABR-PA, INT-BL, and INT-BA provided greater and stable enamel-dentin interaction and bond strength. SIGNIFICANCE: The enamel morphology significantly influenced the enamel bond strength. Using the adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode, enamel must be abraded before etching and must be Al(2)O(3)-blasted when used in SE mode.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.