Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Hydrophilic Implants: A 10-Year Study in a Specialist Private Practice.

AIM: To report the 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants placed in grafted (GBR) and non-grafted (no-GBR) sites in a Swiss specialist private practice using hydrophilic implants with a low surface roughness flange. METHODS: Fifty consecutively enrolled patients received 159 hydrophilic implants with a low surface roughness flange. A first re-evaluation was performed 1 year after delivery of restoration (T1). An additional examination was performed at the 10-year follow-up (T2) including the assessment of clinical (i.e., periodontal/peri-implant pockets probing depths (PPD) (mm), full-mouth bleeding score (%), implant survival rate, mid-buccal keratinized mucosa (KM) width in mm, and peri-implant phenotype), and radiographic (i.e., marginal bone level change [DeltaMBL]) outcomes. Biological, mechanical and technical complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Out of the initial cohort, 22 patients (9/40.9% male and 13/59% female) and 63 implants (47 with GBR, 16 without GBR), could be re-examined at T2. Overall, DeltaMBL (T2-T1) was -0.56 +/- 0.96 mm. In the GBR group, DeltaMBL were significantly higher at the distal sites compared to the no-GBR group (-0.75 +/- 1.17 mm vs. -0.12 +/- 1.29 mm, p = 0.045), however, in the GBR group MBL started at a higher level at T1 but were similar with the no-GBR group at T2. Implant survival was 100% with only very few technical complications (6.3%). Mean PPD amounted to 3.84 +/- 1.00 mm with significantly higher values in the GBR group (3.98 +/- 1.08 mm vs. 3.45 +/- 0.60 mm; p = 0.016). Nineteen implants (30.1%) were diagnosed with peri-implant health while 44 (69.9%) presented with peri-implant mucositis. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, favorable clinical and radiographic conditions were recorded around hydrophilic implants with a low surface roughness flange placed in pristine and augmented bone after 10 years in function.