In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.