Hard and soft tissue remodelling after tooth extraction may result in a concave profile at the subsequent edentulous ridge. This defect may result in a sub-optimal aesthetic transition zone between the soft tissue and the pontic, which may appear to sit on the ridge, rather than emanating from within the ridge, as would a natural tooth. To optimise aesthetics, pontic site augmentation (PSA) (increasing the volume at the pontic site) and pontic site development (PSD) (remodelling the tissue at the pontic site) may provide a solution.This article discusses the role of soft tissue grafting for PSA, alongside the techniques employed for PSD. Biomaterial substitutes may be used for soft tissue grafting; although autogenous tissue remains the gold standard. Patients may benefit from biomaterial substitutes (as no donor site is required) but evidence for long-term volumetric stability within this specific scenario is limited.Studies suggest PSD may be initiated three months post-augmentation, with minimal changes in site volume following this time point; although again, clinical data are limited. PSD can be achieved via several techniques, depending on operator and patient preference, with the ultimate goal of tissue conditioning to accept a convex fit surface that facilitates hygiene practices. PSA and PSD play key roles in the creation of a natural emergence profile at edentulous sites, leading to optimal aesthetics and cleansability.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.