BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly used in healthcare to address patient questions by providing personalized responses. Evaluating their performance is essential to ensure their reliability. This study aimed to assess the performance of three AI chatbots in responding to the frequently asked questions (FAQs) of patients regarding dental prostheses. METHODS: Thirty-one frequently asked questions (FAQs) were collected from accredited organizations' websites and the "People Also Ask" feature of Google, focusing on removable and fixed prosthodontics. Two board-certified prosthodontists evaluated response quality using the modified Global Quality Score (GQS) on a 5-point Likert scale. Inter-examiner agreement was assessed using weighted kappa. Readability was measured using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) indices. Statistical analyses were performed using repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman test, with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The inter-examiner agreement was good. Among the chatbots, Google Gemini had the highest quality score (4.58 +/- 0.50), significantly outperforming Microsoft Copilot (3.87 +/- 0.89) (P =.004). Readability analysis showed ChatGPT (10.45 +/- 1.26) produced significantly more complex responses compared to Gemini (7.82 +/- 1.19) and Copilot (8.38 +/- 1.59) (P <.001). FRE scores indicated that ChatGPT's responses were categorized as fairly difficult (53.05 +/- 7.16), while Gemini's responses were in plain English (64.94 +/- 7.29), with a significant difference between them (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: AI chatbots show great potential in answering patient inquiries about dental prostheses. However, improvements are needed to enhance their effectiveness as patient education tools.
No clinical trial protocols linked to this paper
Clinical trials are automatically linked when NCT numbers are found in the paper's title or abstract.PICO Elements
No PICO elements extracted yet. Click "Extract PICO" to analyze this paper.
Paper Details
MeSH Terms
Associated Data
No associated datasets or code repositories found for this paper.
Related Papers
Related paper suggestions will be available in future updates.