A scoping review of website-based orthognathic surgery information.

OBJECTIVE: Dentofacial disharmony is commonly addressed with orthognathic surgery. High-quality and readable information is essential for patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare. This scoping review aimed to collate and synthesize the literature regarding website-based information on orthognathic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Five databases and the grey literature were searched without location or publication year restrictions. Eligible studies were selected using the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. RESULTS: Nine cross-sectional studies satisfied inclusion criteria. The quality of information was found to be low to moderate. Much of the website content was too complex for the average reader to comprehend. Key information regarding risks and complications was commonly omitted. Higher ranking websites were identified as having lower Ensuring Quality Information for Patients scores. The search terms "orthognathic surgery" and "jaw operation" yielded more accurate information compared to alternative terms. CONCLUSIONS: Websites contain low to moderate quality information regarding orthognathic surgery, often providing content too complex to read and understand. Improving the deficiencies identified in the present review is essential to aid informed decision-making by patients contemplating or undergoing an orthognathic surgery pathway.