Evidence Gaps Analysis

3688 outcomes from 214 review series
Clear
CD003809
Current Version: CD003809.PUB4 | 2 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 15 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
orthodontic patients (any age) 12300 ppm F APF foam 0 ppm F placebo foam Number of participants with new DLs Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) 5000 ppm F toothpaste 1450 ppm F toothpaste Number of participants with new DLs Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) fluoride varnish non-fluoride (placebo) varnish Number of participants with adverse effects Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) fluoride varnish non-fluoride (placebo) varnish Number of participants with more severe DLs Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) fluoride varnish non-fluoride (placebo) varnish Number of participants with new DLs Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) resin-modified glass ionomer cement light-cured composite resin Number of participants with new DLs Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) resin-modified glass ionomer cement light-cured composite resin Number of participants with more severe DLs of aesthetic concern Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) resin-modified glass ionomer cement light-cured composite resin Number of participants with adverse effects Low Not specified
orthodontic patients (any age) 12300 ppm F APF foam 0 ppm F placebo foam Number of participants with more severe DLs No Evidence Yet N/A
orthodontic patients (any age) 12300 ppm F APF foam 0 ppm F placebo foam Number of participants with adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
orthodontic patients (any age) 250 ppm F mouthrinse (100 ppm amine F/150 ppm NaF) 0 ppm F placebo mouthrinse Number of participants with more severe DLs No Evidence Yet N/A
orthodontic patients (any age) 250 ppm F mouthrinse (100 ppm amine F/150 ppm NaF) 0 ppm F placebo mouthrinse Number of participants with adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
orthodontic patients (any age) 5000 ppm F toothpaste 1450 ppm F toothpaste Number of participants with more severe DLs No Evidence Yet N/A
orthodontic patients (any age) 5000 ppm F toothpaste 1450 ppm F toothpaste Number of participants with adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
orthodontic patients (any age) 250 ppm F mouthrinse (100 ppm amine F/150 ppm NaF) 0 ppm F placebo mouthrinse Number of participants with new DLs Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD003809.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Participants undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances Fluoride varnish Placebo varnish Number of patients with new demineralised white lesions Moderate -
CD003809.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Orthodontic patients Compomer Glass ionomer cement White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients Compomer Composite resin White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients Fluoridated composite Non-fluoridated composite White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients Fluoridated elastics Non-fluoridated elastics White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients Fluoride + antimicrobial varnish Fluoride varnish only White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients Glass ionomer cement Composite resin White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients Sodium fluoride mouthrinse No mouthrinse Lesion depth No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients Stannous fluoride mouthrinse MFP mouthrinse White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
Orthodontic patients aged 10-14 Acid-phosphate-fluoride mouthrinse No mouthrinse White spot lesions No Evidence Yet -
CD003811
Current Version: CD003811.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people undergoing tooth extraction antibiotic placebo Dry socket (1st to 7th day) Low Not specified
people undergoing tooth extraction antibiotic placebo Postsurgical infectious complications (1st to 14th day) Low Not specified
people undergoing tooth extraction antibiotic placebo Pain Very Low Not specified
people undergoing tooth extraction antibiotic placebo Adverse effects (1st to 7th day) Very Low Not specified
people undergoing tooth extraction antibiotic placebo Fever (6th to 7th day) Very Low Not specified
people undergoing tooth extraction antibiotic placebo Presence of pain (yes/no on 6th to 7th day) Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD003811.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Patients undergoing tooth extraction Antibiotic Placebo Pain (dichotomous on 6-7th day) Low -
Patients undergoing tooth extraction Antibiotic Placebo Fever (6th-7th day) Low -
Patients undergoing tooth extraction Antibiotic Placebo Adverse effects Moderate -
Patients undergoing tooth extraction Antibiotic Placebo Swelling (7th day) Moderate -
Patients undergoing tooth extraction Antibiotic Placebo Local sign of infection Moderate -
Patients undergoing tooth extraction Antibiotic Placebo Dry socket Moderate -
Patients undergoing tooth extraction Antibiotic Placebo Pain score (VAS 7th day) Moderate -
CD003812
Current Version: CD003812
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Healthy subjects Occlusal adjustment Control TMD incidence No Evidence Yet N/A
TMD patients Occlusal adjustment Control Pain frequency No Evidence Yet N/A
TMD patients Occlusal adjustment Control Globus relief No Evidence Yet N/A
TMD patients Occlusal adjustment Control Headache frequency No Evidence Yet N/A
TMD patients Occlusal adjustment Control Headache severity No Evidence Yet N/A
TMD patients Occlusal adjustment Control Pain severity No Evidence Yet N/A
CD003813
Current Version: CD003813.PUB5 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 3 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
adults or children at risk of endocarditis antibiotic prophylaxis no antibiotic prophylaxis Adverse effects of antibiotics No Evidence Yet N/A
adults or children at risk of endocarditis antibiotic prophylaxis no antibiotic prophylaxis Mortality or serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation No Evidence Yet N/A
adults or children at risk of endocarditis antibiotic prophylaxis no antibiotic prophylaxis Development of endocarditis (in those with definite indication for prophylaxis) Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD003813.PUB4
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adults or children at risk of endocarditis Antibiotic prophylaxis No antibiotic prophylaxis Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
Adults or children at risk of endocarditis Antibiotic prophylaxis No antibiotic prophylaxis Mortality No Evidence Yet -
Adults or children at risk of endocarditis Antibiotic prophylaxis No antibiotic prophylaxis Development of endocarditis (in those with definite indication for prophylaxis) Very Low -
CD003813.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
People with pre-existing cardiac risk factors undergoing dental procedures Antibiotic prophylaxis No prophylaxis Development of endocarditis (pooled data from all three case-control studies) No Evidence Yet -
People with pre-existing cardiac risk factors undergoing dental procedures Antibiotic prophylaxis No prophylaxis Development of endocarditis (definite indication for prophylaxis over 180 days) No Evidence Yet -
CD003813.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
People with pre-existing cardiac risk factors undergoing dental procedures Antibiotic prophylaxis No antibiotic prophylaxis Development of endocarditis (definite indication for prophylaxis over 180 days) No Evidence Yet -
People with pre-existing cardiac risk factors undergoing dental procedures Antibiotic prophylaxis No antibiotic prophylaxis Development of endocarditis (pooled analysis including excluded studies) No Evidence Yet -
CD003814
Current Version: CD003814.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 10 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Partially edentulous patients Fixed dental prosthesis Removable dental prosthesis Caries incidence No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Fixed dental prosthesis Removable dental prosthesis Patient satisfaction No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Fixed dental prosthesis Removable dental prosthesis Incidence free survival No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Fixed dental prosthesis Removable dental prosthesis Prosthesis survival No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients I-bar RDP Circumferential clasp RDP Treatment success No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients I-bar RDP Circumferential clasp RDP Mean change in tooth mobility No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Implant-supported FDP Tooth/implant-supported FDP 10-year success rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Lingual plate RDP Sublingual bar RDP Tooth mobility No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Titanium framework High gold alloy framework Unacceptable prosthesis No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Titanium RDP framework Chromium-cobalt RDP framework Framework fracture No Evidence Yet N/A
CD003815
Current Version: CD003815.PUB4 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 4 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
adults with missing teeth turned implants roughened implants Peri-implantitis Low Not specified
adults with missing teeth turned implants roughened implants Early implant failure Low Not specified
adults with missing teeth implant A implant B Implant failure No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with missing teeth implant A implant B Bone level change No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD003815.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
All patients Turned surface implants Roughened surface implants Perimplantitis at 5 years No Evidence Yet -
All patients Turned surface implants Roughened surface implants Perimplantitis at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
All patients Turned surface implants Roughened surface implants Early implant failures No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles Southern implants Steri-Oss implants Marginal bone loss at 5 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles and maxillae Astra implants Branemark implants Implant failures at 5 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles and maxillae IMZ implants ITI implants Marginal bone loss at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles and maxillae IMZ implants Branemark implants Marginal bone loss at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous maxillae Southern implants Branemark TiUnite implants Implant failures at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
CD003815.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Dental implant patients Turned surface implants Roughened surface implants Perimplantitis at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles Astra implants Branemark implants Implant failures at 5 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles Branemark implants ITI implants Implant failures at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles IMZ implants Branemark implants Marginal bone loss at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles IMZ implants ITI implants Marginal bone loss at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles ITI implants Southern implants Marginal bone changes at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandibles Southern implants Steri-Oss implants Marginal bone loss at 5 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous maxillae Branemark TiUnite implants Southern implants Implant failure at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Single tooth replacement Astra implants ITI implants Implant failures at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
CD003815
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
All patients Turned surface implants Roughened surface implants Peri-implantitis at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
All patients Turned surface implants Roughened surface implants Early implant failures No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Brånemark implants IMZ implants Implant failures at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients ITI SLA screws Southern screws Implant failures at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients ITI SLA screws Southern screws Marginal bone level changes at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Southern implants Steri-Oss implants Marginal bone level changes at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Southern implants Steri-Oss implants Implant failures at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous maxilla patients Brånemark implants ITI implants Marginal bone level changes at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous patients Astra implants Brånemark implants Marginal bone level changes at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous patients Astra implants Brånemark implants Implant failures at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Single tooth replacement patients Astra implants ITI implants Implant failures at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Single tooth replacement patients Astra implants ITI implants Marginal bone level changes at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
CD003875
Current Version: CD003875.PUB3 | 2 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 10 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain GTR REC change Low Not specified
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain Control flap surgery REC change Low Not specified
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain GTR PAL gain Low Not specified
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain Control flap surgery Aesthetics Low Not specified
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain Control flap surgery PPD reduction Low Not specified
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain GTR PPD reduction Low Not specified
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain Control flap surgery PAL gain Low Not specified
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain GTR Tooth loss No Evidence Yet N/A
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain Control flap surgery Tooth loss No Evidence Yet N/A
patients with intrabony defects Emdogain GTR Aesthetics No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD003875.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Patients with intrabony defects EMD Control/placebo Recession No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD Control/placebo PAL gain <2mm No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD GTR Recession No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD Control/placebo PPD reduction No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD GTR Postoperative complications No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD Control/placebo PAL gain No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD GTR PPD reduction No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD GTR PAL gain No Evidence Yet -
Patients with intrabony defects EMD Control/placebo Radiographic bone gain No Evidence Yet -
CD003875
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain GTR Probing attachment levels No Evidence Yet -
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain Control/placebo Probing attachment levels No Evidence Yet -
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain Control/placebo Probing pocket depths No Evidence Yet -
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain Control/placebo Marginal bone levels No Evidence Yet -
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain Control/placebo Gingival recession No Evidence Yet -
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain GTR Probing pocket depths No Evidence Yet -
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain GTR Gingival recession No Evidence Yet -
Patients with periodontal defects Emdogain GTR Postoperative infections No Evidence Yet -
CD003876
Current Version: CD003876.PUB4 | 2 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Caries in permanent teeth: DMFT (3 years) Low Not specified
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Caries in primary teeth: dmft (3 years) Low Not specified
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Antibiotics due to dental infections No Evidence Yet N/A
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Dental pain due to decay No Evidence Yet N/A
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Adverse effects: dental fluorosis No Evidence Yet N/A
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Requirement for general anaesthesia due to dental procedures for caries No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD003876.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Caries in primary teeth: dmft (3 years) Low -
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Caries in permanent teeth: DMFT (3 years) Low -
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Dental pain due to decay No Evidence Yet -
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Adverse effects: dental fluorosis No Evidence Yet -
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Antibiotics due to dental infections No Evidence Yet -
general population fluoridated milk non-fluoridated milk Requirement for general anaesthesia due to dental procedures for caries No Evidence Yet -
CD003876.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Children aged 3 years Fluoridated milk (2.5mg/L) Regular milk DMFT reduction at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 3 years Fluoridated milk (2.5mg/L) Regular milk dmft reduction at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 4.5-5.5 years Fluoridated milk (1.5mg/200mL) Regular milk DMFT reduction at 5 years No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 4.5-5.5 years Fluoridated milk (1.5mg/200mL) Regular milk DMFS reduction at 5 years No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 4.5-5.5 years Fluoridated milk (1.5mg/200mL) Regular milk dmft/dmfs changes No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 4.5-5.5 years Fluoridated milk (1.5mg/200mL) Regular milk DMFT reduction at 4 years No Evidence Yet -
CD003877
Current Version: CD003877.PUB5 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 16 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Children needing dental care Meperidine Placebo Good or better behaviour Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Midazolam (oral) Placebo Houpt/other behavioural score Moderate Not specified
Children needing dental care Chloral hydrate Placebo Good or better behaviour Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Chloral hydrate/promethazine Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Dexmedetomidine Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Diazepam (oral) Placebo Houpt/other behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Hydroxyzine Different dosage of the same sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Ketamine Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Ketamine/midazolam Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Midazolam (any mode of delivery) Different dosage of the same sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Midazolam (intravenous) Placebo Houpt/other behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Midazolam (intravenous) Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Midazolam (oral) Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Midazolam (rectal) Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Nitrous oxide Placebo Houpt/other behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Children needing dental care Sevoflurane Different sedative Any behavioural score Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD003877.PUB4
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Children undergoing dental procedures Chloral hydrate 60mg/kg Placebo Positive behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine Midazolam/acetaminophen Overall behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Intranasal midazolam 0.5mg/kg Intranasal midazolam 0.3mg/kg Treatment completion No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Ketamine/midazolam Midazolam alone Overall sedation No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Ketamine/promethazine Ketamine alone Houpt behavior score No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Meperidine Placebo Good or better behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Oral ketamine Meperidine/promethazine Treatment completion No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Oral midazolam Placebo Overall behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children undergoing dental procedures Sevoflurane + N2O + midazolam N2O + midazolam Treatment completion No Evidence Yet -
CD003877.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Children aged 1-16 years Chloral hydrate (70 mg/kg) Lower doses Crying and quietness No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years Chloral hydrate (75 mg/kg) Chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) Overall behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years Chloral hydrate + hydroxyzine Placebo Overall behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years IV midazolam + nitrous oxide IV midazolam alone Treatment completion rate No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years IV midazolam + nitrous oxide + sevoflurane IV midazolam alone Treatment completion rate No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years Midazolam + ketamine (rectal) Midazolam alone (rectal) Movement absence No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years Nitrous oxide/oxygen Placebo Quiet behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years Oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) Placebo Treatment completion rate No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years Oral midazolam (0.75 mg/kg) Placebo Treatment completion rate No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years Sevoflurane + nitrous oxide Nitrous oxide alone Treatment completion rate No Evidence Yet -
CD003877.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) Placebo Overall behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Chloral hydrate (60mg/kg) Placebo Behavioral improvement No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Chloral hydrate + hydroxyzine Chloral hydrate alone Movement and crying No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Diazepam (0.5mg/kg) Placebo Treatment completion No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Meperidine (0.25-1.0mg/lb) Placebo Global sedation No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Midazolam (0.5mg/kg) Nitrous oxide Overall behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Midazolam (7.5mg) Placebo Overall behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Nitrous oxide/oxygen (50:50) Placebo Anxiety and behavior No Evidence Yet -
Children aged 1-16 years requiring dental treatment Sevoflurane + nitrous oxide Nitrous oxide alone Treatment completion No Evidence Yet -
CD003878
Current Version: CD003878.PUB5 | 4 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 3 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
patients requiring dental implants early loading conventional loading Prosthesis failure at 1 year Very Low Not specified
patients requiring dental implants immediate loading conventional loading Prosthesis failure at 1 year Very Low Not specified
patients requiring dental implants immediate loading early loading Prosthesis failure at 1 year Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD003878.PUB4
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
patients requiring dental implants immediate loading early loading Prosthesis failure at 1 year Low -
patients requiring dental implants early loading conventional loading Prosthesis failure at 1 year Very Low -
patients requiring dental implants immediate loading conventional loading Prosthesis failure at 1 year Very Low -
CD003878.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Dental implant patients Early loading Conventional loading Prosthesis failures No Evidence Yet -
Dental implant patients Early loading Conventional loading Implant failures No Evidence Yet -
Dental implant patients Early loading Conventional loading Marginal bone level changes No Evidence Yet -
Dental implant patients Immediate loading Early loading Prosthesis failures No Evidence Yet -
Dental implant patients Immediate loading Early loading Implant failures No Evidence Yet -
Dental implant patients Immediate loading Conventional loading Marginal bone level changes No Evidence Yet -
Dental implant patients Immediate loading Conventional loading Implant failures No Evidence Yet -
Dental implant patients Immediate loading Conventional loading Prosthesis failures No Evidence Yet -
CD003878.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Edentulous mandible patients Early loading Conventional loading Marginal bone level changes No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Immediate loading Conventional loading Implant failure No Evidence Yet -
CD003878
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Edentulous mandible patients Early loading (6 weeks) Conventional loading (12 weeks) Prosthesis failure No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Early loading (6 weeks) Conventional loading (12 weeks) Implant failure No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Early loading (6 weeks) Conventional loading (12 weeks) Marginal bone loss No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Immediate loading (2-3 days) Conventional loading (4-8 months) Prosthesis failure No Evidence Yet -
Edentulous mandible patients Immediate loading (2-3 days) Conventional loading (4-8 months) Implant failure No Evidence Yet -
CD003879
Current Version: CD003879.PUB5 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Dimensional changes in the dental arch (Little's index of irregularity) Low Not specified
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Health‐related quality of life No Evidence Yet N/A
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Undesirable outcomes associated with removal No Evidence Yet N/A
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Costs No Evidence Yet N/A
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Caries affecting the second molar (bony impaction) Very Low Not specified
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Periodontitis (bony impaction) Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD003879.PUB4
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Dimensional changes in the dental arch (Little's index of irregularity) Low -
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Undesirable outcomes associated with removal No Evidence Yet -
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Health‐related quality of life No Evidence Yet -
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Costs No Evidence Yet -
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Periodontitis (bony impaction) Very Low -
adolescents or adults with asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth extraction (absence) of wisdom teeth retention (presence) of wisdom teeth Caries affecting the second molar (bony impaction) Very Low -
CD003879.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adolescents and adults with impacted asymptomatic wisdom teeth Extraction Retention Quality of life after at least 5 years follow‐up No Evidence Yet -
CD003879.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adolescents with impacted third molars Prophylactic removal No removal Incisor irregularity No Evidence Yet -
Adolescents with impacted third molars Prophylactic removal No removal Arch length No Evidence Yet -
Adolescents with impacted third molars Prophylactic removal No removal Intercanine width No Evidence Yet -
Adolescents with impacted third molars (split-mouth) Prophylactic removal No removal Arch length change No Evidence Yet -
CD003976
Current Version: CD003976.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 11 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
People undergoing orthodontic treatment NSAID Paracetamol Pain assessed with VAS (0 to 100 mm where 0 = no pain) Follow-up: mean 2 hours Low Not specified
People undergoing orthodontic treatment Analgesic Control (placebo or no treatment) Pain assessed with VAS (0 to 100 mm where 0 = no pain) Follow-up: mean 2 hours Moderate Not specified
Pain relief during orthodontic treatment Ibuprofen pre-emptively Ibuprofen post-treatment Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Pain relief during orthodontic treatment Ibuprofen pre-emptively Ibuprofen post-treatment Rescue analgesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Pain relief during orthodontic treatment NSAID Local anaesthetic Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Pain relief during orthodontic treatment NSAID Local anaesthetic Rescue analgesia No Evidence Yet N/A
People undergoing orthodontic treatment Analgesic Control (placebo or no treatment) Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
People undergoing orthodontic treatment Analgesic Control (placebo or no treatment) Rescue analgesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Pain relief during orthodontic treatment Ibuprofen pre-emptively Ibuprofen post-treatment Pain assessed with VAS (0 to 100 mm where 0 = no pain) Follow-up: mean 2 hours Very Low Not specified
Pain relief during orthodontic treatment NSAID Local anaesthetic Pain assessed with VAS (0 to 100 mm where 0 = no pain) Follow-up: mean 2 hours Very Low Not specified
People undergoing orthodontic treatment NSAID Paracetamol Adverse events Very Low Not specified
People undergoing orthodontic treatment NSAID Paracetamol Rescue analgesia Very Low Not specified
CD004150
Current Version: CD004150.PUB4 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Adults aged ≥35 years in India Visual oral screening No screening Stage III or worse at diagnosis No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults aged ≥35 years in India Visual oral screening No screening Overall oral cancer mortality No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults aged ≥35 years in India Visual oral screening No screening 5-year survival rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults aged ≥35 years in India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer incidence No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults aged ≥35 years using tobacco/alcohol in India Visual oral screening No screening Stage III or worse at diagnosis in high-risk individuals No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults aged ≥35 years using tobacco/alcohol in India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer mortality in high-risk individuals No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD004150.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening 5-year survival rate No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer mortality rate per 100000 person-years No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer incidence rate per 100000 person-years No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Early stage (I/II) cancer detection No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India (high-risk men) Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer mortality rate per 100000 person-years No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India (high-risk women) Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer mortality rate per 100000 person-years No Evidence Yet -
CD004150.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adults aged ≥35 in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer incidence (high-risk) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer incidence (all participants) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer mortality (all participants) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer mortality (high-risk) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening 5-year survival rate No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Early stage diagnosis (Stage I/II) No Evidence Yet -
CD004150
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Screening test sensitivity No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Screening test specificity No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Oral cancer incidence rate per 100000 person-years No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Control group oral cancer incidence rate per 100000 person-years No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Age-standardized oral cancer mortality per 100000 person-years (intervention) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Three-year survival rate (intervention) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Three-year survival rate (control) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Early stage (I/II) cancer detection rate (intervention) No Evidence Yet -
Adults aged ≥35 years in Kerala India Visual oral screening No screening Early stage (I/II) cancer detection rate (control) No Evidence Yet -
CD004151
Current Version: CD004151.PUB3 | 2 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 1 gap
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people requiring dental implants zygomatic implants conventional implants Prosthesis failure No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD004151.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
CD004151
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
CD004152
Current Version: CD004152.PUB4 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people requiring dental implants prophylactic antibiotics no antibiotics or placebo Implant failure at 4 months Moderate Not specified
Previous Versions
CD004152.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
patients requiring dental implants antibiotics no antibiotics or placebo Implant failure at 4 months Moderate -
CD004152.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adults receiving dental implants Prophylactic antibiotics No antibiotics/placebo Prosthesis failures No Evidence Yet -
Adults receiving dental implants Prophylactic antibiotics No antibiotics/placebo Implant losses No Evidence Yet -
Adults receiving dental implants Prophylactic antibiotics No antibiotics/placebo Postoperative infections No Evidence Yet -
Adults receiving dental implants Prophylactic antibiotics No antibiotics/placebo Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
CD004152
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
CD004153
Current Version: CD004153.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 5 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Patients with primary occlusal pit and fissure caries Ozone therapy (10s) No ozone Clinical severity index change at 6 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with primary occlusal pit and fissure caries Ozone therapy (10s) No ozone Clinical severity index change at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with primary occlusal pit and fissure caries (pilot) Ozone therapy (40s) No ozone Clinical severity score at 6 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with primary root carious lesions Ozone therapy (10s) No ozone DIAGNOdent measurement at 6 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with primary root carious lesions Ozone therapy (10s) No ozone ECM measurement at 6 months No Evidence Yet N/A
CD004345
Current Version: CD004345.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 24 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary wound closure Secondary wound closure Alveolar osteitis Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal triangular flap envelope flap Alveolar osteitis Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal triangular flap envelope flap Wound infection Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal bone removal techniques (Intervention bone removal technique) conventional technique (Bone removal with bur) Adverse effects ? reactionary bleeding No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal bone removal techniques (Intervention bone removal technique) conventional technique (Bone removal with bur) Permanent altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal bone removal techniques (Intervention bone removal technique) conventional technique (Bone removal with bur) Alveolar osteitis No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Mechanical irrigation (high volume)) Irrigation technique B (Manual irrigation (low volume)) Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Mechanical irrigation (high volume)) Irrigation technique B (Manual irrigation (low volume)) Permanent altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal lingual retractor placed no retractor Alveolar osteitis No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal lingual retractor placed no retractor Wound infection No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal lingual retractor placed no retractor Adverse effects ? reactionary bleeding No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Mechanical irrigation (high volume) Mechanical irrigation (low volume) Permanent altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Mechanical irrigation (high volume) Mechanical irrigation (low volume) Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary wound closure Secondary wound closure Permanent altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal triangular flap envelope flap Adverse effects - reactionary bleeding No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal bone removal techniques (Intervention bone removal technique) conventional technique (Bone removal with bur) Wound infection Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Mechanical irrigation (high volume)) Irrigation technique B (Manual irrigation (low volume)) Alveolar osteitis Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Mechanical irrigation (high volume)) Irrigation technique B (Manual irrigation (low volume)) Wound infection Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal lingual retractor placed no retractor Permanent altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Mechanical irrigation (high volume) Mechanical irrigation (low volume) Alveolar osteitis Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Mechanical irrigation (high volume) Mechanical irrigation (low volume) Wound infection Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary wound closure Secondary wound closure Wound infection Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary wound closure Secondary wound closure Adverse effects ? reactionary bleeding Very Low Not specified
adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal triangular flap envelope flap Permanent altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD004345.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Coronectomy Complete extraction Alveolar nerve damage Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Coronectomy Complete extraction Postoperative pain Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Coronectomy Complete extraction Maximum mouth opening Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Coronectomy Complete extraction Swelling Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Coronectomy Complete extraction Alveolar osteitis Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Coronectomy Complete extraction Infection Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Drain (tube drain or gauze drain) No drain Pain (after 24 hours) Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary (complete) wound closure Secondary (partial) wound closure Maximum mouth opening (after 7 days) Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary (complete) wound closure Secondary (partial) wound closure Alveolar osteitis Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Retractor (subperiosteal or Free's) No retractor Temporary altered tongue chin or lip sensation Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Triangular flap Envelope flap Maximum mouth opening (after 1 week) Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Triangular flap Envelope flap Swelling (after 1 week) Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Triangular flap Envelope flap Infection Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Drain (tube drain or gauze drain) No drain Swelling (after 7 days) Moderate -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Drain (tube drain or gauze drain) No drain Maximum mouth opening (after 7 days) Moderate -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary (complete) wound closure Secondary (partial) wound closure Pain (after 24 hours) Moderate -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary (complete) wound closure Secondary (partial) wound closure Swelling (after 7 days) Moderate -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Triangular flap Envelope flap Alveolar osteitis Moderate -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Triangular flap Envelope flap Mean pain at 24 hours Moderate -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Bone removal techniques (Lingual split with chisel) Bone removal with bur All outcomes No Evidence Yet -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Low volume (approx 25 ml)) Irrigation technique B (High volume (approx 175 ml)) Infection Very Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Low volume (approx 25 ml)) Irrigation technique B (High volume (approx 175 ml)) Alveolar osteitis Very Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Mechanical irrigation (high volume)) Irrigation technique B (Manual irrigation (low volume)) Infection Very Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Irrigation technique A (Mechanical irrigation (high volume)) Irrigation technique B (Manual irrigation (low volume)) Alveolar osteitis Very Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary (complete) wound closure Secondary (partial) wound closure Adverse effects - reactionary bleeding Very Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Primary (complete) wound closure Secondary (partial) wound closure Infection Very Low -
Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal Triangular flap Envelope flap Permanent tongue chin or lip sensation Very Low -
CD004346
Current Version: CD004346.PUB5 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 9 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) 24-month recall 6-month recall Oral-health-related quality of life High None
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 6-month recall Caries - Number of tooth surfaces with any caries High None
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 6-month recall Oral-health-related quality of life High None
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 6-month recall Periodontal disease - Percentage of sites with gingival bleeding High None
Primary care patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 24-month recall Periodontal disease - Percentage of sites with gingival bleeding High None
Primary care patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 24-month recall Oral-health-related quality of life High None
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) 24-month recall 6-month recall Caries - Prevalence of moderate to extensive caries Low Not specified
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) 24-month recall 6-month recall Periodontal disease - Percentage of sites with gingival bleeding Moderate Not specified
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) 24-month recall 6-month recall Caries - Number of tooth surfaces with any caries Moderate Not specified
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 6-month recall Caries - Prevalence of moderate to extensive caries Moderate Not specified
Primary care patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 24-month recall Caries - Number of tooth surfaces with any caries Moderate Not specified
Primary care patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 24-month recall Caries - Prevalence of moderate to extensive caries Moderate Not specified
Primary care dental patients (aged ≤ 20 years) 24-month recall 12-month recall Periodontal disease No Evidence Yet N/A
Primary care dental patients (aged ≤ 20 years) 24-month recall 12-month recall Other harms No Evidence Yet N/A
Primary care dental patients (aged ≤ 20 years) 24-month recall 12-month recall Oral-health-related quality of life No Evidence Yet N/A
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) 24-month recall 6-month recall Other harms No Evidence Yet N/A
Primary care dental patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 6-month recall Other harms No Evidence Yet N/A
Primary care patients (aged ≥ 18 years) Risk-based recall 24-month recall Other harms No Evidence Yet N/A
Primary care dental patients (aged ≤ 20 years) 24-month recall 12-month recall Caries (primary teeth) - dmfs increment in 3- to 5-year-olds Very Low Not specified
Primary care dental patients (aged ≤ 20 years) 24-month recall 12-month recall Caries (permanent teeth) - DMFS increment in 16- to 20-year-olds Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD004346.PUB4
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
children and adults clinical examination at 12 months clinical examination at 24 months Caries (dmfs/DMFS increment) - 3-5 year olds (primary teeth) Very Low -
children and adults clinical examination at 12 months clinical examination at 24 months Total time (minutes) - 16-20 year olds (permanent teeth) Very Low -
children and adults clinical examination at 12 months clinical examination at 24 months Total time (minutes) - 3-5 year olds (primary teeth) Very Low -
children and adults clinical examination at 12 months clinical examination at 24 months Caries (dmfs/DMFS increment) - 16-20 year olds (permanent teeth) Very Low -
CD004346.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Treatment time No Evidence Yet -
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall DMFS increment No Evidence Yet -
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Examination time No Evidence Yet -
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Total clinical time No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Total clinical time No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Treatment time No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall DMFS increment No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Examination time No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Examination time No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall dmfs increment No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Total clinical time No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Treatment time No Evidence Yet -
CD004346.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Examination time No Evidence Yet -
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall DMFS increment No Evidence Yet -
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Total clinical time No Evidence Yet -
16-18 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Treatment time No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Treatment time No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Examination time No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall DMFS increment No Evidence Yet -
18-20 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Total clinical time No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Treatment time No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Total clinical time No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall dmfs increment No Evidence Yet -
3-5 year olds 12-month recall 24-month recall Examination time No Evidence Yet -
CD004347
Current Version: CD004347.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 9 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Direct resin composite Other veneers Original restoration survival No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Direct resin composite Porcelain Absolute failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Direct resin composite Other veneers Patient satisfaction No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Indirect resin composite Porcelain Absolute failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Indirect resin composite Other veneers Original restoration survival No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Indirect resin composite Other veneers Patient satisfaction No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Porcelain Other veneers Original restoration survival No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Porcelain Other veneers Patient satisfaction No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients requiring 1-6 maxillary anterior veneers Porcelain Other veneers Absolute failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
CD004483
Current Version: CD004483.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 8 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Children aged 4-9 years with primary molars Compomer (Dyract) Amalgam Surface texture failures at 24 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-9 years with primary molars Compomer (Dyract) Amalgam Marginal integrity (occlusal) failures at 24 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-9 years with primary molars Compomer (Dyract) Amalgam Secondary caries at 24 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-9 years with primary molars Compomer (Dyract) Amalgam Cervical gaps on X-rays at 24 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-9 years with primary molars Compomer (Dyract) Amalgam Radiolucencies on X-rays at 24 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 6-9 years with primary molars Resin-modified glass ionomer Amalgam Restoration failure at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Children with primary molars Aesthetic crowns Stainless steel crowns Restoration failure at 6 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Children with primary molars Aesthetic crowns Stainless steel crowns Gingival health at 6 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Showing 41 to 60 of 214 review series
Summary Statistics
214
Review Series
3688
PICO Questions
Evidence Certainty
High
(%)
Moderate
(%)
Low
(%)
Very Low
(%)
No Evidence Yet
(%)
GRADE Downgrading Reasons
Risk of Bias
985 (85.8%)
Imprecision
895 (78.0%)
Inconsistency
253 (22.0%)
Indirectness
188 (16.4%)
Publication Bias
48 (4.2%)