Evidence Gaps Analysis

3688 outcomes from 214 review series
Clear
CD009197
Current Version: CD009197.PUB5 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment – scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice community care – advice only All CVD‐related death No Evidence Yet N/A
people with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment – scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice community care – advice only All‐cause death No Evidence Yet N/A
people with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment – scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice community care – advice only All cardiovascular events Very Low Not specified
people with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome scaling and root planing (SRP) plus antibiotics supragingival scaling All‐cause death Very Low Not specified
people with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome scaling and root planing (SRP) plus antibiotics supragingival scaling All CVD‐related death Very Low Not specified
people with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome scaling and root planing (SRP) plus antibiotics supragingival scaling All cardiovascular events Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD009197.PUB4
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
people with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment – scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice community care – advice only All CVD‐related death No Evidence Yet -
people with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment – scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice community care – advice only All‐cause death No Evidence Yet -
people with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment – scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice community care – advice only All cardiovascular events Very Low -
people with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome scaling and root planing (SRP) plus antibiotics supragingival scaling All‐cause death Very Low -
people with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome scaling and root planing (SRP) plus antibiotics supragingival scaling All cardiovascular events Very Low -
people with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome scaling and root planing (SRP) plus antibiotics supragingival scaling All CVD‐related death Very Low -
CD009197.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
patients with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment community care All-cause and CVD-related death No Evidence Yet -
patients with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment community care All cardiovascular events Very Low -
CD009197.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
patients with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment community care All-cause and CVD-related death No Evidence Yet -
patients with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis periodontal treatment community care All cardiovascular events Very Low -
CD009376
Current Version: CD009376.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 15 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Minocycline or doxycycline gel plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Clinical attachment level (mm) Low Not specified
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Minocycline or doxycycline gel plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Pocket depth (mm) Low Not specified
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving SPT SPT performed by general dental practitioners under specialist prescription SPT performed in a specialist practice Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving SPT SPT performed by general dental practitioners under specialist prescription SPT performed in a specialist practice Clinical attachment loss No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving SPT SPT performed by general dental practitioners under specialist prescription SPT performed in a specialist practice Tooth loss No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Minocycline or doxycycline gel plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Minocycline or doxycycline gel plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Tooth loss No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Tooth loss No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Bleeding on probing No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving SPT SPT performed by general dental practitioners under specialist prescription SPT performed in a specialist practice Bleeding on probing (%) Very Low Not specified
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving SPT SPT performed by general dental practitioners under specialist prescription SPT performed in a specialist practice Probing pocket depth (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Minocycline or doxycycline gel plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Bleeding on probing (ratios) Very Low Not specified
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Probing pocket depth (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement Mechanical debridement Clinical attachment level (mm) Very Low Not specified
CD009378
Current Version: CD009378.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 2 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Children aged 4 to 12 years Behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) No intervention or delayed intervention Caries - DMFS (prevented fraction (PF)) Low Not specified
Children aged 4 to 12 years Behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) No intervention or delayed intervention Plaque indices Low Not specified
CD009409
Current Version: CD009409.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 13 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
People diagnosed with periodontitis Periodontal treatment No treatment Short‐term change of DBP (mmHg) Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis Periodontal treatment No treatment Long‐term change of SBP (mmHg) Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis Periodontal treatment No treatment Short‐term change of SBP (mmHg) Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis Periodontal treatment No treatment Long‐term change of DBP (mmHg) Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis Periodontal treatment No treatment Long‐term change of DBP (mmHg) Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis and other cardiovascular diseases except hypertension Periodontal treatment No treatment Long‐term change of DBP (mmHg) Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis and other cardiovascular diseases except hypertension Periodontal treatment No treatment Long‐term change of SBP (mmHg) Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis, or hypertension, or both Periodontal treatment Supra‐gingival scaling Short‐term change of DBP (mmHg) – people diagnosed with periodontitis Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis and hypertension Periodontal treatment Supra‐gingival scaling Short‐term change of SBP (mmHg) Moderate Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis and hypertension Periodontal treatment Supra‐gingival scaling Short‐term change of DBP (mmHg) Moderate Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis, or hypertension, or both Periodontal treatment Supra‐gingival scaling nan Moderate Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis and other cardiovascular diseases except hypertension Periodontal treatment No treatment Short‐term change of SBP (mmHg) Very Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis and other cardiovascular diseases except hypertension Periodontal treatment No treatment Short‐term change of DBP (mmHg) Very Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis, or hypertension, or both Periodontal treatment Supra‐gingival scaling Long‐term change of SBP (mmHg) – people diagnosed with periodontitis Very Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis, or hypertension, or both Periodontal treatment Supra‐gingival scaling Short‐term change of SBP (mmHg) – people diagnosed with periodontitis Very Low Not specified
People diagnosed with periodontitis, or hypertension, or both Periodontal treatment Supra‐gingival scaling Long‐term change of DBP (mmHg) – people diagnosed with periodontitis Very Low Not specified
CD009434
Current Version: CD009434.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 10 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Changes in intensity of pain (VAS) when tested through tactile stimuli - short term (0 to 24 hours) Low Not specified
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Adverse events Low Not specified
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Changes in intensity of pain (VAS) when tested through air blast stimuli - short term (0 to 24 hours) Low Not specified
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Adverse events Low Not specified
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Patient-reported quality of life No Evidence Yet N/A
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Patient-reported quality of life No Evidence Yet N/A
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Changes in intensity of pain (VAS) when tested through tactile stimuli - long term (more than 2 months) Very Low Not specified
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Changes in intensity of pain (VAS) when tested through air blast stimuli - long term (more than 2 months) Very Low Not specified
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Changes in intensity of pain (VAS) when tested through tactile stimuli - medium term (24 hours to 2 months) Very Low Not specified
patients with dentinal hypersensitivity laser placebo/no treatment Changes in intensity of pain (VAS) when tested through air blast stimuli - medium term (24 hours to 2 months) Very Low Not specified
CD009603
Current Version: CD009603.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 7 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Stimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Low Not specified
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Mouth dryness (at the end of treatment 4–6 weeks) Low Not specified
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Unstimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Low Not specified
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Unstimulated whole saliva (1 year follow‐up) Low Not specified
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Stimulated whole saliva (1 year follow‐up) Low Not specified
People with dry mouth due to Sjögren's Syndrome Electrostimulation Placebo Stimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Very Low Not specified
People with dry mouth due to Sjögren's Syndrome Electrostimulation Placebo Unstimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD009603.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Unstimulated whole saliva (1 year follow‐up) Low -
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Stimulated whole saliva (1 year follow‐up) Low -
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Mouth dryness (at the end of treatment 4–6 weeks) Low -
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Unstimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Low -
People with dry mouth due to either radiotherapy or Sjögren's Syndrome Acupuncture Placebo (sham acupuncture) Stimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Low -
People with dry mouth due to Sjögren's Syndrome Electrostimulation Placebo Unstimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Very Low -
People with dry mouth due to Sjögren's Syndrome Electrostimulation Placebo Stimulated whole saliva (end of treatment) Very Low -
CD009606
Current Version: CD009606.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 3 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
adults (18 years of age or older) with prosthodontic restorations metal-free materials metal-ceramic or other conventional all-metal materials failure of the prosthesis Very Low Not specified
adults (18 years of age or older) with prosthodontic restorations metal-free materials metal-ceramic or other conventional all-metal materials complications Very Low Not specified
adults (18 years of age or older) with prosthodontic restorations metal-free materials metal-ceramic or other conventional all-metal materials aesthetic evaluation Very Low Not specified
CD009742
Current Version: CD009742.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 12 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Infiltration injection LA, intraligamental LA No treatment Physiological parameters No Evidence Yet N/A
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Infiltration injection LA, intraligamental LA No treatment Bleeding No Evidence Yet N/A
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Intraligamental injection LA No treatment Bleeding No Evidence Yet N/A
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Intraligamental injection LA No treatment Physiological parameters No Evidence Yet N/A
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Topical LA Placebo or no treatment Physiological parameters No Evidence Yet N/A
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Infiltration injection LA Placebo or no treatment Bleeding Very Low Not specified
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Infiltration injection LA Placebo or no treatment Physiological parameters Very Low Not specified
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Infiltration injection LA Placebo or no treatment Pain or distress Very Low Not specified
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Infiltration injection LA, intraligamental LA No treatment Pain or distress Very Low Not specified
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Intraligamental injection LA No treatment Pain Very Low Not specified
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Topical LA Placebo or no treatment Bleeding Very Low Not specified
Children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic Topical LA Placebo or no treatment Pain or distress Very Low Not specified
CD009853
Current Version: CD009853.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 9 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Children undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices Capitation remuneration Fee-for-service remuneration Measures of health service utilisation: mean number of visits per 0- to 15-year-old Low Not specified
Children undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices Capitation remuneration Fee-for-service remuneration Patient outcomes: mean percentage of 0- to 15-year-olds having one or more teeth extracted Low Not specified
Children undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices Capitation remuneration Fee-for-service remuneration Patient outcomes: mean number of decayed teeth per 14- to 15-year-old (data for 0- to 15-year-olds NR) Low Not specified
Children undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices Capitation remuneration Fee-for-service remuneration Measures of clinical activity: mean percentage of 0- to 15-year-olds receiving active preventive advice Low Not specified
Children undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices Capitation remuneration Fee-for-service remuneration Healthcare costs: mean expenditure in GBP (currency year NR) per 0- to 15-year-old Low Not specified
Children undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices Capitation remuneration Fee-for-service remuneration Patient outcomes: mean number of filled teeth per 0- to 15-year-old Low Not specified
Dentists seeing children with erupted second permanent molars Fee-for-service remuneration No specific intervention Measures of clinical activity: mean percentage of 12- to 14-year-olds receiving fissure sealants for second permanent molars per dentist (weighted by number of children seen) – adjusted Very Low Not specified
Dentists seeing children with erupted second permanent molars Fee-for-service remuneration No specific intervention Measures of clinical activity: mean percentage of 12- to 14-year-olds receiving fissure sealants for second permanent molars per dentist (weighted by number of children seen) – unadjusted Very Low Not specified
Dentists seeing children with erupted second permanent molars Fee-for-service remuneration No specific intervention Healthcare costs: cost-effectiveness of fee-for-service vs. control (reported as the "% change in outcome per £[GBP]" – currency year NR) Very Low Not specified
CD009857
Current Version: CD009857.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 14 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Flossing plus toothbrushing Gingivitis Low Not specified
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Flossing plus toothbrushing Plaque Low Not specified
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Toothbrushing alone Quality of life No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Toothbrushing alone Periodontitis No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Toothbrushing alone Interproximal caries No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Toothbrushing alone Harms and adverse outcomes No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Toothbrushing alone Bad breath (halitosis) No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Flossing plus toothbrushing Interproximal caries No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Flossing plus toothbrushing Harms and adverse outcomes No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Flossing plus toothbrushing Bad breath (halitosis) No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Flossing plus toothbrushing Quality of life No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Flossing plus toothbrushing Periodontitis No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Toothbrushing alone Gingivitis Very Low Not specified
Adults 16 years and older Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Toothbrushing alone Plaque Very Low Not specified
CD009858
Current Version: CD009858.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 5 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
dental patients requiring restorative treatment rubber dam cotton rolls Survival rate of restorations (6 months) Low Not specified
dental patients requiring restorative treatment rubber dam cotton rolls Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
dental patients requiring restorative treatment rubber dam cotton rolls Survival rate of restorations (24 months) Very Low Not specified
dental patients requiring restorative treatment rubber dam cotton rolls Survival rate of restorations (12 months) Very Low Not specified
dental patients requiring restorative treatment rubber dam cotton rolls Survival rate of restorations (18 months) Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD009858.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
dental patients rubber dam cotton rolls Survival rate (6 months) Very Low -
dental patients rubber dam cotton rolls Survival rate (24 months) Very Low -
CD010136
Current Version: CD010136.PUB4 | 2 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 14 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis Single dose of systemic antibiotics (clindamycin) with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Matched placebo with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Pain at 24 hours Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis Single dose of systemic antibiotics (clindamycin) with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Matched placebo with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Pain at 72 hours Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis Single dose of systemic antibiotics (clindamycin) with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Matched placebo with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Pain at 7 days Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis Single dose of systemic antibiotics (clindamycin) with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Matched placebo with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Adverse effects Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis Single dose of systemic antibiotics (clindamycin) with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Matched placebo with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Swelling at 7 days Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis Single dose of systemic antibiotics (clindamycin) with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Matched placebo with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Swelling at 24 hours No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis Single dose of systemic antibiotics (clindamycin) with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Matched placebo with total chemo-mechanical debridement and root filling Swelling at 72 hours No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess 7 days of postoperative systemic antibiotics (phenoxymethylpenicillin) with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Matched placebo with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Swelling at 7 days Very Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess 7 days of postoperative systemic antibiotics (phenoxymethylpenicillin) with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Matched placebo with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Pain at 7 days Very Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess 7 days of postoperative systemic antibiotics (phenoxymethylpenicillin) with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Matched placebo with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Pain at 72 hours Very Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess 7 days of postoperative systemic antibiotics (phenoxymethylpenicillin) with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Matched placebo with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Pain at 24 hours Very Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess 7 days of postoperative systemic antibiotics (phenoxymethylpenicillin) with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Matched placebo with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Adverse effects Very Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess 7 days of postoperative systemic antibiotics (phenoxymethylpenicillin) with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Matched placebo with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Swelling at 24 hours Very Low Not specified
Adults with symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess 7 days of postoperative systemic antibiotics (phenoxymethylpenicillin) with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Matched placebo with partial or total chemo-mechanical debridement and analgesics Swelling at 72 hours Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD010136.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Adverse effects No Evidence Yet -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Pain at 72 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Swelling at 72 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Swelling at 48 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Pain at 24 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Pain at 48 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Swelling at 24 hours Very Low -
CD010136.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Adverse effects No Evidence Yet -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Swelling at 48 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Swelling at 72 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Pain at 48 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Pain at 72 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Swelling at 24 hours Very Low -
adults with a symptomatic necrotic tooth or localised acute apical abscess (no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement) systemic antibiotics, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics matched placebo, partial or total pulpectomy and analgesics Pain at 24 hours Very Low -
CD010173
Current Version: CD010173.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 3 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
OSCC or OPMD symptom‐free individuals screened opportunistically or through an organised screening programme Conventional oral examination/visual inspection nan OSCC or OPMD Low Not specified
OSCC or OPMD symptom‐free individuals with tobacco habits Conventional oral examination plus vital rinsing (toluidine blue) Conventional oral examination alone Oral cancer as indicated by the National Cancer Registry Moderate Not specified
OSCC or OPMD symptom‐free individuals screened through an organised screening programme Mouth self‐examination nan OSCC or OPMD Very Low Not specified
OSCC or OPMD symptom‐free individuals screened through an organised screening programme Remote screening of the oral cavity nan OSCC or OPMD Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD010173.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened opportunistically, or through an organised screening programme (Individuals attending for opportunistic screening (2), organised screening programme (4), validation as part of an organised screening programme or randomised controlled trial (3), screening as part of a routine surveillance appointment (1)) Conventional oral examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened opportunistically, or through an organised screening programme (Individuals attending for opportunistic screening (2), organised screening programme (4), validation as part of an organised screening programme or randomised controlled trial (3), screening as part of a routine surveillance appointment (1)) Conventional oral examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened opportunistically, or through an organised screening programme (Individuals attending for opportunistic screening (2), organised screening programme (4), validation as part of an organised screening programme or randomised controlled trial (3), screening as part of a routine surveillance appointment (1)) Conventional oral examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened opportunistically, or through an organised screening programme (Individuals attending for opportunistic screening (2), organised screening programme (4), validation as part of an organised screening programme or randomised controlled trial (3), screening as part of a routine surveillance appointment (1)) Conventional oral examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened through an organised screening programme ( Individuals attending for organised screening programme (2)) Mouth self examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened through an organised screening programme ( Individuals attending for organised screening programme (2)) Mouth self examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened through an organised screening programme ( Individuals attending for organised screening programme (2)) Mouth self examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals screened through an organised screening programme ( Individuals attending for organised screening programme (2)) Mouth self examination No comparison Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals with tobacco habits (Individuals attending an organised screening programme) Conventional oral examination plus vital rinsing (Toluidine blue) Conventional oral examination alone Detection of oral pre‐malignant lesions and malignant lesions No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer or potentially malignant disorder symptom‐free individuals with tobacco habits (Individuals attending an organised screening programme) Conventional oral examination plus vital rinsing (Toluidine blue) Conventional oral examination alone Incidence of oral cancer No Evidence Yet -
CD010176
Current Version: CD010176.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 42 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts Xenografts Complications Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts Xenografts Complications Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (xenografts)) Extraction Complications Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts Xenografts Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts Xenografts Implant failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allografts without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allografts without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allografts without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Implant failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts Xenografts Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts single particle size Alloplasts multiple particle size Implant failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts single particle size Alloplasts multiple particle size Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts single particle size Alloplasts multiple particle size Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts with membrane Alloplasts without membrane Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts with membrane Alloplasts without membrane Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts with membrane Alloplasts without membrane Implant failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (alloplasts)) Extraction Changes in width of alveolar ridge (mm) No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (alloplasts)) Extraction Implant failure rate No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (alloplasts)) Extraction Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (alloplasts)) Extraction Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (xenografts)) Extraction Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts Xenografts Changes in height of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts Xenografts Changes in width of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts Xenografts Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allografts without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Changes in width of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allografts without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Changes in height of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Allografts with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allografts without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Complications Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts Xenografts Implant failure rate Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts Xenografts Changes in width of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts Xenografts Changes in height of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts Xenografts Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts single particle size Alloplasts multiple particle size Changes in width of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts single particle size Alloplasts multiple particle size Changes in height of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts single particle size Alloplasts multiple particle size Complications Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts with membrane Alloplasts without membrane Changes in width of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts with membrane Alloplasts without membrane Changes in height of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplasts with membrane Alloplasts without membrane Complications Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (alloplasts)) Extraction Complications Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (alloplasts)) Extraction Changes in height of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (xenografts)) Extraction Changes in width of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (xenografts)) Extraction Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (xenografts)) Extraction Changes in height of alveolar ridge (mm) Very Low Not specified
Adults requiring replacement of missing teeth Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques (bone grafting (xenografts)) Extraction Implant failure rate Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD010176.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft Extraction Changes in width of alveolar ridge at 6 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft Extraction Changes in height of alveolar ridge at 6 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Changes in height of alveolar ridge at 6 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Changes in width of alveolar ridge at 6 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Implant failures at 12 months Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Changes in height of alveolar ridge at 12 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Changes in probing pocket depth at teeth adjacent to the extraction site at 12 months (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Changes in width of alveolar ridge at 9 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Changes in height of alveolar ridge at 9 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Changes in width of alveolar ridge at 6 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Changes in height of alveolar ridge at 6 month follow-up (mm) Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Peri-implant marginal bone level changes at 7 months Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Implant failures at 7-36 months Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement at 7-36 months Low -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Changes in width of alveolar ridge at 6-12 month follow-up (mm) Moderate -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Changes in width of alveolar ridge at 6-36 month follow-up (mm) Moderate -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Changes in height of alveolar ridge at 6-36 month follow-up (mm) Moderate -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft Extraction Changes in clinical attachment level (CAL) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft Extraction Changes in probing depth at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft Extraction Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft Extraction Complications (e.g. discomfort pain and swelling) No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft Extraction Prosthodontic outcomes of rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Complications (e.g. discomfort pain and swelling) No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Changes in clinical attachment level (CAL) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Peri-implant marginal bone level changes No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Allograft with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Allograft without synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 Prosthodontic outcomes of rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Changes in clinical attachment level (CAL) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Complications (e.g. discomfort pain and swelling) No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Prosthodontic outcomes of rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Peri-implant marginal bone level changes No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast Xenograft Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Prosthodontic outcomes of rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Changes in clinical attachment level (CAL) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Peri-implant marginal bone level changes No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Alloplast with membrane Alloplast without membrane Complications (e.g. discomfort pain and swelling) No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Changes in clinical attachment level (CAL) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Peri-implant marginal bone level changes No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Complications (e.g. discomfort pain and swelling) No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth DBM single particles DBM multiple particles Prosthodontic outcomes of rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Prosthodontic outcomes of rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Complications (e.g. discomfort pain and swelling) No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Changes in probing depth at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
People requiring replacement of missing teeth Xenograft Extraction Changes in clinical attachment level (CAL) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site No Evidence Yet -
CD010229
Current Version: CD010229.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 7 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth laser for caries removal standard drill for caries removal Caries removal Low Not specified
people with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth laser for caries removal standard drill for caries removal Need for anaesthesia - children Low Not specified
people with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth laser for caries removal standard drill for caries removal Pain - 6-face rating scale (moderate and high pain) Low Not specified
people with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth laser for caries removal standard drill for caries removal Pulpal inflammation or necrosis - 6 months follow-up Very Low Not specified
people with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth laser for caries removal standard drill for caries removal Marginal integrity of restorations - 6 months follow-up Very Low Not specified
people with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth laser for caries removal standard drill for caries removal Pulpal inflammation or necrosis - 1 week follow-up Very Low Not specified
people with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth laser for caries removal standard drill for caries removal Durability of restoration - 6 months follow-up Very Low Not specified
CD010263
Current Version: CD010263.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 12 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
adolescents and adults undergoing orthodontic treatment low-level laser therapy placebo Patient-reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS 1-100mm) - 24 hours Low Not specified
adolescents and adults undergoing orthodontic treatment low-level laser therapy placebo Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
adolescents and adults undergoing orthodontic treatment vibratory stimulation no intervention or placebo vibration Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment chewing gum or wafer placebo or no chewing gum Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
adults undergoing orthodontic treatment brain wave music (BWM) no special instructions Adverse effects for BWM No Evidence Yet N/A
adults undergoing orthodontic treatment cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) no special instructions Adverse effects for CBT No Evidence Yet N/A
people undergoing orthodontic treatment text message no text message Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
adolescents and adults undergoing orthodontic treatment vibratory stimulation no intervention or placebo vibration Patient-reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS 1-100mm) - 24 hours Very Low Not specified
adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment chewing gum or wafer placebo or no chewing gum Patient-reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS upon chewing 1-100mm) - 24 hours Very Low Not specified
adults undergoing orthodontic treatment brain wave music (BWM) no special instructions Patient-reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS 1-100mm) - 24 hours Very Low Not specified
adults undergoing orthodontic treatment cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) no special instructions Patient-reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS 1-100mm) - 24 hours Very Low Not specified
people undergoing orthodontic treatment text message no text message Patient-reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS 1-100mm) - 24 hours Very Low Not specified
CD010341
Current Version: CD010341.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 11 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers EGFR mAb (either cetuximab or nimotuzumab + either RT or CRT) RT or CRT alone Overall survival Moderate Not specified
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers EGFR mAb (either cetuximab or nimotuzumab + either RT or CRT) RT or CRT alone Locoregional control Moderate Not specified
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers EGFR mAb (either cetuximab or nimotuzumab + either RT or CRT) RT or CRT alone Adverse effects (skin toxicity/acneiform rash - grades ≥ 3) No Evidence Yet N/A
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers EGFR mAb (either cetuximab or nimotuzumab + either RT or CRT) RT or CRT alone Adverse effects (skin toxicity/acneiform rash - all grades) No Evidence Yet N/A
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers EGFR mAb (either cetuximab or nimotuzumab + either RT or CRT) RT or CRT alone Progression-free survival No Evidence Yet N/A
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Recombinant Interleukin (rIL-2) + standard therapy (surgery) Standard therapy (surgery) alone Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib gefitinib or lapatinib) + standard therapy (either RT or CRT) Standard therapy (either RT or CRT alone) Adverse effects (gastrointestinal complaints - all grades) No Evidence Yet N/A
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Recombinant Interleukin (rIL-2) + standard therapy (surgery) Standard therapy (surgery) alone Overall survival Very Low Not specified
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Recombinant Interleukin (rIL-2) + standard therapy (surgery) Standard therapy (surgery) alone Disease-free survival Very Low Not specified
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib gefitinib or lapatinib) + standard therapy (either RT or CRT) Standard therapy (either RT or CRT alone) Progression-free Survival Very Low Not specified
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib gefitinib or lapatinib) + standard therapy (either RT or CRT) Standard therapy (either RT or CRT alone) Locoregional control Very Low Not specified
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib gefitinib or lapatinib) + standard therapy (either RT or CRT) Standard therapy (either RT or CRT alone) Overall survival Very Low Not specified
People with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib gefitinib or lapatinib) + standard therapy (either RT or CRT) Standard therapy (either RT or CRT alone) Disease-free Survival Very Low Not specified
CD010403
Current Version: CD010403.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Long-term skeletal relapse Very Low Not specified
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Psychological status Very Low Not specified
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Velopharyngeal function Very Low Not specified
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Speech (deterioration) Very Low Not specified
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Clinical morbidities Very Low Not specified
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Maxillary advancement Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD010403.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Maxillary advancement Very Low -
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Long-term skeletal relapse Very Low -
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Speech (deterioration) Very Low -
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Velopharyngeal function Very Low -
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Psychological status Very Low -
Cleft patients Maxillary distraction osteogenesis Orthognathic surgery Clinical morbidities Very Low -
CD010431
Current Version: CD010431.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 1 gap
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people with dental decay on proximal surfaces of primary and permanent teeth different micro‐invasive methods (e.g. resin infiltration resin sealant sealant patch and glass ionomer) non‐invasive treatments (e.g. fluoride varnish advice to floss) Caries progression measured by DSR > pairwise > visual scoring (12 months to 36 months follow‐up) Moderate Not specified
people with dental decay on proximal surfaces of primary and permanent teeth different micro‐invasive methods (e.g. resin infiltration resin sealant sealant patch and glass ionomer) non‐invasive treatments (e.g. fluoride varnish advice to floss) Change in decayed, missing and filled (DMF/dmf) figures at surface, tooth and whole mouth level. No Evidence Yet N/A
CD010470
Current Version: CD010470.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 7 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
idiopathic dysgeusia combined with hypogeusia acupuncture sham control Taste discrimination assessed with 32 taste strips with a follow-up of 8 weeks Very Low Not specified
patients with taste disturbances, zinc-deficient/idiopathic taste disorder zinc placebo Taste acuity improvement (patient-reported outcome) assessed with VAS/questionnaire where improvement in dysgeusia is defined as more than 5% improvement in the VAS scores for a mean follow-up period of 3 months Very Low Not specified
patients with taste disturbances, zinc-deficient/idiopathic taste disorder zinc placebo Taste acuity improvement (objective outcome - dichotomous data) assessed with filter paper disk and Henkin's 3-drop stimulus method for a mean follow-up period of 3 months Very Low Not specified
patients with taste disturbances, zinc-deficient/idiopathic taste disorder zinc placebo Cross-over trial - taste detection assessed with Henkin's method for a follow-up period of 6 months Very Low Not specified
patients with taste disturbances, zinc-deficient/idiopathic taste disorder zinc placebo Cross-over trial - taste recognition assessed with Henkin's method for a follow-up period of 6 months Very Low Not specified
patients with taste disturbances, zinc-deficient/idiopathic taste disorder zinc placebo Taste acuity improvement (objective outcome - continuous data) assessed with filter paper strip and filter paper disk methods for a mean follow-up period of 3 months Very Low Not specified
patients with taste disturbances, zinc-deficient/idiopathic taste disorder and taste disorder secondary to chronic renal failure zinc placebo Adverse events - follow-up range 12 weeks to 18 weeks Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD010470.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
patients with taste disturbances acupuncture sham control Taste discrimination Low -
patients with taste disturbances zinc placebo Taste acuity improvement - Objective outcome - Dichotomous - Idiopathic and zinc deficient taste disorders Low -
patients with taste disturbances zinc placebo Taste acuity improvement - Objective outcome - Continuous - Overall taste improvement Moderate -
patients with taste disturbances zinc placebo Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
patients with taste disturbances zinc placebo Taste acuity improvement - Patient reported outcome Very Low -
patients with taste disturbances zinc placebo Taste acuity improvement - Objective outcome - Continuous - Taste recognition Very Low -
Showing 161 to 180 of 214 review series
Summary Statistics
214
Review Series
3688
PICO Questions
Evidence Certainty
High
(%)
Moderate
(%)
Low
(%)
Very Low
(%)
No Evidence Yet
(%)
GRADE Downgrading Reasons
Risk of Bias
985 (85.8%)
Imprecision
895 (78.0%)
Inconsistency
253 (22.0%)
Indirectness
188 (16.4%)
Publication Bias
48 (4.2%)