Evidence Gaps Analysis

3688 outcomes from 214 review series
Clear
CD006205
Current Version: CD006205.PUB5 | 3 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 38 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
adults with oral cancer elective radical ND elective selective ND Adverse events associated with treatment Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer sentinel node biopsy elective ND Total mortality Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer sentinel node biopsy elective ND New disease, progression, and mortality Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer sentinel node biopsy elective ND Locoregional recurrence Low Not specified
adults with oropharyngeal cancer surgery radiotherapy alone Total mortality Low Not specified
adults with oropharyngeal cancer surgery radiotherapy alone New disease, progression, and mortality Low Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective ND therapeutic (delayed) ND Adverse events associated with treatment Moderate Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective ND therapeutic (delayed) ND Locoregional recurrence Moderate Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective ND therapeutic (delayed) ND New disease, progression, and mortality Moderate Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective ND therapeutic (delayed) ND Mortality Moderate Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective ND therapeutic (delayed) ND Recurrence Moderate Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned ND before or after chemoradiotherapy Locoregional recurrence Moderate Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned ND before or after chemoradiotherapy Total mortality Moderate Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective radical ND elective selective ND Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned ND before or after chemoradiotherapy Recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned ND before or after chemoradiotherapy New disease, progression, and mortality No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer superselective ND selective ND Recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer superselective ND selective ND Total mortality No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid ND modified radical ND Recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid ND modified radical ND Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid ND modified radical ND New disease, progression, and mortality No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid ND modified radical ND Total mortality No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy New disease, progression, and mortality No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Adverse events associated with treatment No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + radiotherapy radiotherapy alone New disease, progression, and mortality No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + radiotherapy radiotherapy alone Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + radiotherapy radiotherapy alone Recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oropharyngeal cancer surgery radiotherapy alone Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oropharyngeal cancer surgery radiotherapy alone Recurrence No Evidence Yet N/A
adults with oral cancer elective radical ND elective selective ND New disease, progression, and mortality Very Low Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective radical ND elective selective ND Total mortality Very Low Not specified
adults with oral cancer elective radical ND elective selective ND Recurrence Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned ND before or after chemoradiotherapy Adverse events associated with treatment Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer sentinel node biopsy elective ND Adverse events associated with treatment Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer sentinel node biopsy elective ND Recurrence Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer superselective ND selective ND Locoregional recurrence Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer superselective ND selective ND New disease, progression, and mortality Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer superselective ND selective ND Adverse events associated with treatment Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid ND modified radical ND Adverse events associated with treatment Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Locoregional recurrence Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Total mortality Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + radiotherapy radiotherapy alone Total mortality Very Low Not specified
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + radiotherapy radiotherapy alone Adverse events associated with treatment Very Low Not specified
adults with oropharyngeal cancer surgery radiotherapy alone Adverse events associated with treatment Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD006205.PUB4
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective neck dissection therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective neck dissection therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection Recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective radical neck dissection elective selective neck dissection Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective radical neck dissection elective selective neck dissection Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned neck dissection either before or after chemoradiotherapy Disease free survival No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned neck dissection either before or after chemoradiotherapy Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned neck dissection either before or after chemoradiotherapy Recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned neck dissection either before or after chemoradiotherapy Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer super-selective neck dissection selective neck dissection Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer super-selective neck dissection selective neck dissection Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer super-selective neck dissection selective neck dissection Disease free survival No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer super-selective neck dissection selective neck dissection Recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer super-selective neck dissection selective neck dissection Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid neck dissection modified radical neck dissection Disease free survival No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid neck dissection modified radical neck dissection Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid neck dissection modified radical neck dissection Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid neck dissection modified radical neck dissection Recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer supraomohyoid neck dissection modified radical neck dissection Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Disease free survival No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Locoregional recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Recurrence No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy chemotherapy Adverse events No Evidence Yet -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective neck dissection therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection New disease, progression or mortality Very Low -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective neck dissection therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection Locoregional recurrence Very Low -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective neck dissection therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection Total mortality Very Low -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective radical neck dissection elective selective neck dissection Recurrence Very Low -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective radical neck dissection elective selective neck dissection New disease, progression or mortality Very Low -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer elective radical neck dissection elective selective neck dissection Total mortality Very Low -
adults with oral or oropharyngeal cancer PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy planned neck dissection either before or after chemoradiotherapy Total mortality Very Low -
CD006205.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Oral cavity cancer Radical neck dissection Selective neck dissection Disease recurrence No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer Radical neck dissection Selective neck dissection Overall survival No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer with clinically negative neck nodes Elective neck dissection Therapeutic neck dissection Disease-free survival No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer with clinically negative neck nodes Elective radical neck dissection Therapeutic neck dissection Overall survival No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity cancer with clinically negative neck nodes Elective SOH neck dissection Therapeutic neck dissection Overall survival No Evidence Yet -
Oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer Surgery plus radiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
CD006205.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Oral cancer Surgery + elective supraomohyoid dissection Surgery alone Disease-related mortality at 3.5 years No Evidence Yet -
Oral cancer Surgery + perioperative MTX Surgery alone Recurrent disease at primary site at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Oral cancer Surgery + perioperative MTX Surgery alone Total recurrent disease at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Oral cancer Surgery + perioperative MTX Surgery alone Disease-free survival at 2 years No Evidence Yet -
Oral cancer Surgery + perioperative MTX Surgery alone Disease-free survival at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Oral/head and neck cancer Surgery + pre-operative radiotherapy Surgery alone Disease-free survival at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Oral/head and neck cancer Surgery + pre-operative radiotherapy Surgery alone Disease-related mortality at 1 year No Evidence Yet -
Oral/head and neck cancer Surgery + RT + cisplatin Surgery + RT Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
Oral/head and neck cancer Surgery + RT + cisplatin Surgery + RT Death or recurrent disease No Evidence Yet -
Oral/oropharyngeal cancer Surgery + conventional PORT Surgery + accelerated PORT Death or recurrent disease (neck nodes) No Evidence Yet -
Oral/oropharyngeal cancer Surgery + RT + carboplatin/5-FU Surgery + RT Death or recurrent disease No Evidence Yet -
Oral/oropharyngeal cancer Surgery + RT + IL-2 Surgery + RT Recurrent disease at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
Oral/oropharyngeal cancer Surgery + RT + IL-2 Surgery + RT Disease-free survival at 3 years No Evidence Yet -
CD006334
Current Version: CD006334.PUB4 | 2 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 1 gap
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
nan Sedation General anesthesia nan No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD006334.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan Sedation General anesthesia nan No Evidence Yet -
CD006334.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
CD006384
Current Version: CD006384.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 1 gap
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD006384.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
CD006385
Current Version: CD006385.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
TMJ patients Arthroscopy Open surgery Clinical evaluations at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
TMJ patients Arthroscopy Nonsurgical treatment Pain at 6 months No Evidence Yet N/A
TMJ patients Arthroscopy Arthrocentesis Pain at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
TMJ patients Arthroscopy Arthrocentesis Maximum interincisal opening at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
TMJ patients Arthroscopy Open surgery Mandibular function at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
TMJ patients Arthroscopy Open surgery Pain at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006386
Current Version: CD006386.PUB4 | 2 older versions
Current Evidence Gaps 3 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people receiving treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer induction chemotherapy plus locoregional treatment locoregional treatment alone Overall survival - platinum + 5-FU + surgery vs. surgery Low Not specified
people receiving treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer induction chemotherapy plus locoregional treatment locoregional treatment alone Overall survival - cisplatin + 5-FU + CRT (cisplatin) vs. CRT (cisplatin) Low Not specified
people receiving treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer induction chemotherapy plus locoregional treatment locoregional treatment alone Overall survival - cisplatin + 5-FU + docetaxel + CRT (cisplatin) vs. CRT (cisplatin) Low Not specified
people receiving treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer concomitant chemoradiotherapy radiotherapy alone (non-resectable) Overall survival - CRT vs. RT Moderate Not specified
people receiving treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer induction chemotherapy plus locoregional treatment locoregional treatment alone Overall survival - platinum + 5-FU + RT vs. RT Moderate Not specified
people receiving treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant treatment A surgery +/- adjuvant treatment B Overall survival - adjuvant chemotherapy vs. observation alone Moderate Not specified
people receiving treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer surgery + adjuvant treatment A surgery +/- adjuvant treatment B Overall survival - adjuvant CRT vs. adjuvant RT Moderate Not specified
Previous Versions
CD006386.PUB3
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer concomitant chemoradiotherapy radiotherapy alone Total Mortality Low -
patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer surgery +/- RT + chemotherapy surgery +/- RT alone Total Mortality Low -
patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer concomitant chemoradiotherapy radiotherapy alone Total Mortality Moderate -
patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer induction chemotherapy plus locoregional treatment (LRT) locoregional treatment Total Mortality Moderate -
patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer surgery +/- RT + chemotherapy surgery +/- RT alone Total Mortality Moderate -
patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer induction chemotherapy plus locoregional treatment (LRT) locoregional treatment Total Mortality Very Low -
CD006386.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Head and neck cancer patients (>50% oral/oropharyngeal) Induction chemotherapy + LRT LRT alone Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (>50% oral/oropharyngeal) Induction chemotherapy + LRT LRT alone Progression free survival No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (>50% oral/oropharyngeal) Induction chemotherapy + LRT LRT alone Disease free survival No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (non-resectable) Alternating chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (non-resectable) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Progression free survival No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (non-resectable) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Locoregional control No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (non-resectable) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Disease free survival No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (non-resectable) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (non-resectable) Platin + 5-FU concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (non-resectable) Platin-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (post-surgery) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Disease free survival No Evidence Yet -
Head and neck cancer patients (post-surgery) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy Radiotherapy alone Total mortality No Evidence Yet -
CD006387
Current Version: CD006387.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 1 gap
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
people with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer altered fractionation conventional radiotherapy Mortality (follow-up: 5 years) Moderate Not specified
people with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer altered fractionation conventional radiotherapy Mortality (follow-up: 5 years) Very Low Not specified
CD006487
Current Version: CD006487.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 53 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Low Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Low Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Low Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Low Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Low Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% prilocaine plain 2% lidocaine 1:100, 000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Low Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Moderate Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) Moderate Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection Moderate Not specified
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% prilocaine plain 2% lidocaine 1:100, 000 epinephrine Speed of onset of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% prilocaine plain 2% lidocaine 1:100, 000 epinephrine Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% prilocaine plain 2% lidocaine 1:100, 000 epinephrine Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% prilocaine plain 2% lidocaine 1:100, 000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain following injection No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% prilocaine plain 2% lidocaine 1:100, 000 epinephrine Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition) No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% prilocaine plain 2% lidocaine 1:100, 000 epinephrine Duration of anaesthesia No Evidence Yet N/A
Participants regardless of age and gender who were undergoing dental procedures and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which dental local anaesthesia was tested 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine Success of local anaesthesia, measured by the absence of pain during a procedure using a visual analogue scale or other appropriate method (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) Very Low Not specified
CD006538
Current Version: CD006538.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 1 gap
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006540
Current Version: CD006540.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 7 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Adults consuming alcohol Motivational interviewing Usual care Drinking >21 units alcohol/week at 12 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults consuming alcohol Motivational interviewing Usual care Drinking >21 units alcohol/week at 3 months No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with S. mutans Sugar restriction advice No advice Sugar intake frequency at 12 weeks No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with S. mutans Sugar restriction advice No advice Sugar intake frequency at 6 weeks No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 11-12 years Individualized prevention program Basic prevention Using xylitol >3x/day No Evidence Yet N/A
Edentulous adults Dietary counseling Usual care Starting to drink fruit juice No Evidence Yet N/A
Edentulous adults Dietary counseling Usual care Fruit consumption (g/day) No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006541
Current Version: CD006541.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 1 gap
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Patients with TMD Orthodontic treatment No orthodontic treatment nan No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006542
Current Version: CD006542.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 11 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Extra-oral pulp extirpation at day 0 Intra-oral extirpation at day 7 Radiographic resorption (a proxy measure for periodontal healing) at 12 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Pulpal healing at 12 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Tooth survival at 12 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Periodontal healing at 12 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Ledermix Ultracal Discolouration at 12 months - patient level - worst case scenario for Ledermix Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Ledermix Ultracal Periodontal healing at 12 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Ledermix Ultracal Tooth survival at 12 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Ledermix Ultracal Discolouration at 12 months - patient level - best case scenario for Ledermix Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Thymosin alpha 1 Control (saline) Periodontal healing at 48 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Thymosin alpha 1 Control (saline) Tooth survival at 48 months Very Low Not specified
People with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth Thymosin alpha 1 Control (saline) Tooth survival at 12 months Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD006542.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Patients with avulsed teeth Extra-oral pulp extirpation at day 0 Intra-oral pulp extirpation at week 1 Root resorption at 12 months No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Pulp survival at 12 months (worst case) No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Tooth survival at 12 months (worst case) No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Periodontal healing at 12 months (worst case) No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Pulp survival at 12 months No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Tooth survival at 12 months No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Hyperbaric oxygen Control Periodontal healing at 12 months No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Thymosin alpha 1 soaking Saline soaking Periodontal healing at 48 months (worst case) No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Thymosin alpha 1 soaking Saline soaking Periodontal healing at 48 months No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Thymosin alpha 1 soaking Saline soaking Tooth survival at 48 months (worst case) No Evidence Yet -
Patients with avulsed teeth Thymosin alpha 1 soaking Saline soaking Tooth survival at 48 months No Evidence Yet -
CD006697
Current Version: CD006697.PUB2 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 10 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Edentulous mandibles Crestal incision Vestibular incision Prosthesis/implant failure No Evidence Yet N/A
Fully edentulous maxillae Flapless surgery Flap elevation Implant failure No Evidence Yet N/A
Implant patients Erbium:YAG laser Conventional flap Postoperative pain No Evidence Yet N/A
Implants with minimal keratinized mucosa Xenogeneic collagen matrix Connective tissue autograft Recession No Evidence Yet N/A
Implants with minimal keratinized mucosa Xenogeneic collagen matrix Connective tissue autograft Keratinized mucosa width No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Flapless surgery Flap elevation Prosthesis/implant failure No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Flapless surgery Flap elevation Patient preference No Evidence Yet N/A
Partially edentulous patients Flapless surgery Flap elevation Postoperative pain No Evidence Yet N/A
Posterior mandible Connective tissue graft No augmentation Pink aesthetic scores No Evidence Yet N/A
Posterior mandible Connective tissue graft No augmentation Soft tissue thickness No Evidence Yet N/A
Previous Versions
CD006697
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Dental implant patients Erbium:YAG laser Conventional flap elevation Postoperative pain No Evidence Yet -
Partially edentulous patients Flapless surgery Conventional flap elevation Complications No Evidence Yet -
Partially/fully edentulous patients Crestal incision Vestibular incision Postoperative complications No Evidence Yet -
Partially/fully edentulous patients Flapless surgery Conventional flap elevation Postoperative pain No Evidence Yet -
CD006698
Current Version: CD006698.PUB2 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
patients requiring dental implants 1-stage placement 2-stage placement Implant failure Moderate Not specified
patients requiring dental implants 1-stage placement 2-stage placement Prosthetic failure Moderate Not specified
Previous Versions
CD006698
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Adults requiring mandibular implants 1-stage implant procedure 2-stage implant procedure Prosthesis failure No Evidence Yet -
Adults requiring mandibular implants 1-stage implant procedure 2-stage implant procedure Implant failure No Evidence Yet -
CD006700
Current Version: CD006700.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 9 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Children 1-6 years with gingivostomatitis Acyclovir Placebo Duration of drooling (days) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children 1-6 years with gingivostomatitis Acyclovir Placebo Duration of viral shedding (days) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children 1-6 years with gingivostomatitis Acyclovir Placebo Duration of drinking difficulties (days) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children 1-6 years with gingivostomatitis Acyclovir Placebo Duration of eating difficulties (days) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children 1-6 years with gingivostomatitis Acyclovir Placebo Duration of extraoral lesions (days) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children 1-6 years with gingivostomatitis Acyclovir Placebo Duration of fever (days) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children 1-6 years with gingivostomatitis Acyclovir Placebo Duration of oral lesions (days) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children mean age 2 years with herpetic infection Acyclovir tablets Placebo Time to resolution of pain No Evidence Yet N/A
Children mean age 2 years with herpetic infection Acyclovir tablets Placebo Time to resolution of hypersialorrhea No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006701
Current Version: CD006701.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 5 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Adults with halitosis Cetylpyridinium chloride + essential oils + chlorine dioxide + zinc (Breath Rx) Placebo VSC reduction at 4 weeks No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with halitosis Chlorhexidine + cetylpyridinium chloride + zinc lactate Placebo VSC reduction at 2 weeks No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with halitosis Chlorhexidine + cetylpyridinium chloride + zinc lactate Placebo Organoleptic score reduction at 2 weeks No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with halitosis Garcinia mangostana L extract Placebo VSC reduction at 15 days No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with halitosis Two-phase oil-water (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride) Essential oils (Listerine) Organoleptic score reduction at 6 weeks No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006703
Current Version: CD006703.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 8 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Pre-operative gap size during speech (Group 2) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Post-operative gap size during closure (Group 2) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Post-operative gap size during closure (Group 1) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Complete closure (Group 2) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Complete closure (Group 1) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Residual post-operative VPI (Group 2) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Residual post-operative VPI (Group 1) No Evidence Yet N/A
Children aged 4-7 years with submucous cleft palate MIPP MIPP with additional velopharyngeal surgery Pre-operative gap size during speech (Group 1) No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006706
Current Version: CD006706.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 12 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Cancer patients Aciclovir Placebo Viral isolates No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients Aciclovir Placebo HSV oral lesions No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients IV aciclovir Placebo Viral isolates No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients IV aciclovir Placebo HSV oral lesions No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients Oral aciclovir Placebo HSV oral lesions No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients Oral aciclovir Oral valaciclovir HSV lesions No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients Oral aciclovir Placebo Viral isolates No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients Prostaglandin E Placebo Viral isolates No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients (adults+children) Aciclovir Placebo HSV oral lesions No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients (adults+children) Aciclovir Placebo Viral isolates No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients (adults only) Aciclovir Placebo Viral isolates No Evidence Yet N/A
Cancer patients (adults only) Aciclovir Placebo HSV oral lesions No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006963
Current Version: CD006963.PUB2
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Patients with mandibular prognathism IVRO SSRO Sagittal changes of pogonion (1 week to 1 year) No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with mandibular prognathism IVRO SSRO Vertical changes of pogonion (1 week to 1 year) No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with mandibular prognathism IVRO SSRO Vertical changes of B-point (1 week to 1 year) No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with mandibular prognathism IVRO SSRO Sagittal changes of B-point (1 week to 1 year) No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with mandibular prognathism VRO with osteosynthesis VRO without osteosynthesis Fossa-condyle relations anterior (1 year) No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients with mandibular prognathism VRO with osteosynthesis VRO without osteosynthesis Fossa-condyle relations posterior (1 year) No Evidence Yet N/A
CD006966
Current Version: CD006966.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 6 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
People with maxillary palatally impacted canines Open surgical technique Closed surgical technique Gum health Low Not specified
People with maxillary palatally impacted canines Open surgical technique Closed surgical technique Success of surgery Low Not specified
People with maxillary palatally impacted canines Open surgical technique Closed surgical technique Complications No Evidence Yet N/A
People with maxillary palatally impacted canines Open surgical technique Closed surgical technique Patient response Very Low Not specified
People with maxillary palatally impacted canines Open surgical technique Closed surgical technique Aesthetics Very Low Not specified
People with maxillary palatally impacted canines Open surgical technique Closed surgical technique Treatment time Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD006966.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
nan nan nan nan No Evidence Yet -
CD006968
Current Version: CD006968.PUB3 | 1 older version
Current Evidence Gaps 12 gaps
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Downgrade Reason
Patients having a tooth extraction Chlorhexidine gel Chlorhexidine rinse Presence of dry socket Low Not specified
Patients having a tooth extraction Chlorhexidine gel Placebo/no treatment Presence of dry socket Moderate Not specified
Patients having a tooth extraction Chlorhexidine rinse Placebo/no treatment Presence of dry socket Moderate Not specified
Adults with dry socket Zinc oxide eugenol Alvogyl Swelling No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with dry socket Zinc oxide eugenol Alvogyl Adverse effects No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with dry socket Zinc oxide eugenol Alvogyl Healing No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with dry socket Zinc oxide eugenol Alvogyl Fever No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with dry socket Zinc oxide eugenol Alvogyl Limitation of chewing or swallowing No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients having a tooth extraction Chlorhexidine gel Chlorhexidine rinse Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients having a tooth extraction Chlorhexidine gel Placebo/no treatment Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients having a tooth extraction Chlorhexidine rinse Placebo/no treatment Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Patients having a tooth extraction Platelet rich plasma Placebo/no treatment Adverse events No Evidence Yet N/A
Adults with dry socket Zinc oxide eugenol Alvogyl Pain Very Low Not specified
Patients having a tooth extraction Platelet rich plasma Placebo/no treatment Presence of dry socket Very Low Not specified
Previous Versions
CD006968.PUB2
Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Evidence Level Studies
Patients with the management of dry socket Chlorhexidine gel Control Presence of dry socket Moderate -
Patients with the management of dry socket Chlorhexidine rinse Control Presence of dry socket Moderate -
Showing 101 to 120 of 214 review series
Summary Statistics
214
Review Series
3688
PICO Questions
Evidence Certainty
High
(%)
Moderate
(%)
Low
(%)
Very Low
(%)
No Evidence Yet
(%)
GRADE Downgrading Reasons
Risk of Bias
985 (85.8%)
Imprecision
895 (78.0%)
Inconsistency
253 (22.0%)
Indirectness
188 (16.4%)
Publication Bias
48 (4.2%)